Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add alexclowe/awesome-copilot-cowork-plugins --skill regulatory-standard-mappinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alexclowe/awesome-copilot-cowork-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexclowe/awesome-copilot-cowork-plugins/regulatory-standard-mapping)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexclowe/awesome-copilot-cowork-plugins/regulatory-standard-mapping"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexclowe/awesome-copilot-cowork-plugins/regulatory-standard-mapping/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexclowe/awesome-copilot-cowork-plugins/regulatory-standard-mapping"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexclowe/awesome-copilot-cowork-plugins/regulatory-standard-mapping.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00745 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00373 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
regulatory-standard-mapping scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 47 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You have deep expertise in mapping ESG initiatives to regulatory and voluntary frameworks. When the user is working on ESG sustainability tasks, apply this knowledge automatically.
Core competencies
Voluntary frameworks:
- GRI Standards — Universal Standards (GRI 1, 2, 3) plus topic standards (GRI 200 economic, 300 environmental, 400 social). Cite by disclosure number (e.g., GRI 305-1 for direct GHG emissions)
- SASB Standards — 77 industry standards, now under the IFRS Foundation. Use the SASB Materiality Map and cite topic + accounting metric codes (e.g., FB-FR-110a.1)
- TCFD — four pillars (Governance, Strategy, Risk Management, Metrics & Targets); now consolidated into IFRS S2
Mandatory regimes:
- EU CSRD / ESRS — Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, in force phased 2024–2028. Topical standards ESRS E1–E5 (climate, pollution, water, biodiversity, resource use), S1–S4 (own workforce, value chain workers, affected communities, consumers), G1 (business conduct). Double-materiality is mandatory
- EU Taxonomy — six environmental objectives; activities must meet substantial-contribution criteria, do-no-significant-harm, and minimum social safeguards
- SFDR — Article 6 / 8 / 9 fund classifications; Principal Adverse Impact (PAI) indicators
- SEC Climate Disclosure (where in effect) — governance, strategy, risk management, metrics; Scope 1/2 with Scope 3 conditions; financial-statement footnote integration
- UK SECR — Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting for in-scope companies
- CSDDD (EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive) — value-chain human rights and environmental due diligence
Cross-walks and mapping:
- GRI ↔ ESRS (the GRI-EFRAG interoperability index covers most material disclosures)
- IFRS S1/S2 ↔ TCFD (S2 supersedes TCFD with additional Scope 3 and industry-specific guidance)
- SASB ↔ ESRS topical standards (mostly complementary; SASB feeds ESRS materiality assessment)
- CDP ↔ TCFD (CDP questionnaire aligned to TCFD pillars)
Anti-greenwashing rules:
- EU Green Claims Directive (proposal) — substantiation and verification requirements
- US FTC Green Guides — environmental marketing claims
- UK CMA Green Claims Code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 47 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 3e0768261eb3
regulatory-standard-mapping is a skill published in the GitHub repository alexclowe/awesome-copilot-cowork-plugins (17 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 745 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
general-counsel-reviewer
Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a General Counsel archetype, then saves a structured review document with a verdict, findings that cite the artifact, legal risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks for a legal review, a general counsel pressure-test of a document…
works-council-reviewer
Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or rollout plan in character as a Works Council Representative archetype, then saves a structured review document with a verdict, findings that cite the artifact, employee-impact risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks for a works council review, an…
personal-data-protection
Personal-data-protection compliance reference for engineers building applications subject to Singapore PDPA, Indonesia UU PDP 27/2022, Thailand PDPA B.E. 2562 (2019), Malaysia PDPA 2010 (with the 2024 Amendments), or Philippines DPA (RA 10173). Use when reviewing or modifying code that touches personal data …
eu-ai-act-readiness
Build a preliminary, evidence-based EU AI Act readiness assessment across AI-system inventory, territorial scope, operator roles, prohibited-practice screening, risk classification, transparency, high-risk controls, general-purpose AI obligations, governance, and implementation milestones. Use when an organization…
compliance-checklist-generation
Build evidence-oriented readiness checklists for frameworks such as SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and GDPR, with gaps and remediation priorities. Use when the user needs an internal readiness assessment or control-mapping plan; do not use it to certify compliance or replace an auditor or counsel.
license-analysis
Analyze open-source license compatibility, obligations, and compliance risks across project dependencies. Use when the user requests license analysis or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.