Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add alexvtejeda/elenchus --skill elenchus-buildgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alexvtejeda/elenchusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexvtejeda/elenchus/elenchus-build)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexvtejeda/elenchus/elenchus-build"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexvtejeda/elenchus/elenchus-build/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexvtejeda/elenchus/elenchus-build"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexvtejeda/elenchus/elenchus-build.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00157 | $0.04488 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00078 | $0.02244 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00898 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00449 |
Grade A, and why
elenchus-build scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 293 lines · 157 tokens per session scan A 2ba173670398
elenchus-build is a skill published in the GitHub repository alexvtejeda/elenchus (2 stars, last pushed 24d ago), with no licence file. It adds 157 tokens to every session and 4,488 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-findings
Addresses and fixes findings from a QA code review. Reads the review report, fixes critical and warning issues, and prepares for re-verification. Delegates to the Forja (Dev) agent.
code-health
Scans the codebase for dead code, tech debt, outdated dependencies, and code quality issues. Delegates to the Centinela (QA) agent.
consult-codex
Dual-AI code analysis pairing OpenAI Codex with Claude code-searcher — the lightest consult variant, two citation-verified perspectives. Use for a quick second opinion on a code question.
mstar-audit
Morning Star codebase audit — survey any repository and produce prioritized, self-contained improvement plans for the normal Prepare → Execute flow. Strictly read-only on source code. Use when asked to audit or survey a codebase, find improvement opportunities (bugs, security, performance, test gaps, tech debt…
mstar-coding-behavior
A set of coding guidelines for implementation, debugging, refactoring, and code review. It emphasizes understanding the code first, making small focused changes, reproducing bugs before fixing them, and checking feedback with evidence.
mstar-review-qc
Morning Star QC orchestration — SDD mandatory plan QC tri-review ({SDDDIR}/review/qc1.md…qc3.md + consolidated); inline/hotfix single-seat (qc.md in review bundle); PM dispatch timing, tri identity gate, residual registration contract, layer boundaries, durable plan summary. Leaf QC execution →…