my-claude-code-setup is a starter configuration and memory-bank template for Claude Code, providing project guidance and reusable setup for Claude Code sessions. Developers use it to organize Claude Code behavior, memory, commands, skills, subagents, hooks, and settings. The catalogue entries are components of this Claude Code workflow.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add centminmod/my-claude-code-setup --skill consult-codexgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/centminmod/my-claude-code-setupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/centminmod/my-claude-code-setup/consult-codex)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/centminmod/my-claude-code-setup/consult-codex"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/centminmod/my-claude-code-setup/consult-codex/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/centminmod/my-claude-code-setup/consult-codex"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/centminmod/my-claude-code-setup/consult-codex.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 4 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Agent Snooping · line 160 Skill reads from agent configuration directories (.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/). These directories may contain API keys, personal settings, and other credentials that the skill has no legitimate need to access.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that access agent configuration directories (.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/). If configuration values are needed, pass them explicitly as parameters or environment variabl
- high Agent Snooping · line 201 Skill reads from agent configuration directories (.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/). These directories may contain API keys, personal settings, and other credentials that the skill has no legitimate need to access.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that access agent configuration directories (.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/). If configuration values are needed, pass them explicitly as parameters or environment variabl
- high Tool Misuse · line 313 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- medium Rogue Agent · line 152 Skill establishes unauthorized persistence across sessions via cron jobs, startup scripts, or state files. Session persistence allows an attacker to maintain access beyond the current interaction.Fix: Remove any persistence mechanisms (cron jobs, startup scripts, state files). Skills should not maintain state across sessions without explicit user consent.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.05034 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.02014 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.01007 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00503 |
Grade B, and why
consult-codex scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reads agent configuration directoriesmediumAgent snooping
.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.
(`~/.codex/config.toml` — this installation is configured for `gpt-5.6-sol`, high effort). Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- consult-zai — 88% identical, 313 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 395 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Dual-AI Consultation: Codex vs Code-Searcher
You orchestrate consultation between OpenAI's Codex and Claude's code-searcher to provide comprehensive analysis with comparison.
When to Use This Skill
High value queries:
- Complex code analysis requiring multiple perspectives
- Debugging difficult issues
- Architecture/design questions
- Code review requests
- Finding specific implementations across a codebase
Lower value (single AI may suffice):
- Simple syntax questions
- Basic file lookups
- Straightforward documentation queries
Workflow
When the user asks a code question:
1. Build Enhanced Prompt
Problem-restate pre-flight (non-blocking). Before building the prompt, emit ONE line restating the code question you are about to dispatch (and, only if genuinely ambiguous, the alternative reading), then proceed:
Reading this as: «one-line restatement» (alt: «other reading», if any) — proceeding to consult; interrupt now to correct the framing.
Emit-and-proceed — do not ask-and-wait (the orchestrator can't reliably detect its own misframing). One line, and it guards the whole dispatch against a wrong-framing run.
Wrap the user's question with structured output requirements:
[USER_QUESTION]
=== Analysis Guidelines ===
**Structure your response with:**
1. **Summary:** 2-3 sentence overview
2. **Key Findings:** bullet points of discoveries
3. **Evidence:** file paths with line numbers (format: `file:line` or `file:start-end`)
4. **Confidence:** High/Medium/Low with reasoning
5. **Limitations:** what couldn't be determined
**Line Number Requirements:**
- ALWAYS include specific line numbers when referencing code
- Use format: `path/to/file.ext:42` or `path/to/file.ext:42-58`
- For multiple references: list each on a SEPARATE line with its own file path
(avoid comma-separated multi-citation like `file.ts:45, 67, 98`)
- Include brief code snippets for key findings
**Examples of good citations:**
- "The authentication check at `src/auth/validate.ts:127-134`"
- "Configuration loaded from `config/settings.json:15`"
- "Error handling in `lib/errors.ts:45`, `lib/errors.ts:67-72`, and `lib/errors.ts:98`"
**Citations Index (required):** end your response with a fenced block, one line per
Key Finding (repeat each block entry's `file:line` inline in the finding as usual):
```citations
<finding #> — path/to/file.ext:LINE[-END]
```
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 395 lines · 44 tokens per session scan B 877b23ca8f0f
consult-codex is a skill published in the GitHub repository centminmod/my-claude-code-setup (2,671 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 5,034 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (reads agent configuration directories). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-findings
Addresses and fixes findings from a QA code review. Reads the review report, fixes critical and warning issues, and prepares for re-verification. Delegates to the Forja (Dev) agent.
code-health
Scans the codebase for dead code, tech debt, outdated dependencies, and code quality issues. Delegates to the Centinela (QA) agent.
octocode-roast
Use when code needs a blunt evidence-backed roast or memorable critique: smell inventory, debt ranking, hot-path autopsy, savage/diff review, security or performance sins, or practical redemption paths. Phrases like roast this, brutal review, top sins, cleanup debt. Polite evidence-first PR review → octocode-research.
generic-fullstack-code-reviewer
Review full-stack code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md compliance. Enforces TypeScript strict mode, input validation, GPU-accelerated animations, and design system consistency. Use when completing features, before commits, or reviewing pull requests.
generic-code-reviewer
Review code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md workflow compliance. Supports any tech stack - HTML/CSS/JS, React, TypeScript, Node.js, Python, NestJS, Next.js, and more. Use when completing features, before commits, or reviewing pull requests.
review-change
Review a change with only applicable internal axes, classify every finding, persist fix-now work, and return one evidence-backed decision. Findings only; --adversarial N uses isolated reviewers; --synthesize fuses supplied reviewer tables. Triggers: "review-change", "review this change", "adversarial review".