Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add alfredolopez80/multi-agent-ralph-loop --skill autoresearchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alfredolopez80/multi-agent-ralph-loopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alfredolopez80/multi-agent-ralph-loop/autoresearch)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alfredolopez80/multi-agent-ralph-loop/autoresearch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alfredolopez80/multi-agent-ralph-loop/autoresearch/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alfredolopez80/multi-agent-ralph-loop/autoresearch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alfredolopez80/multi-agent-ralph-loop/autoresearch.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.08134 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.03254 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.01627 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00813 |
Grade A, and why
autoresearch scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 826 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 76a97152e66c
autoresearch is a skill published in the GitHub repository alfredolopez80/multi-agent-ralph-loop (146 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 8,134 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
train-pose
Train/evaluate WiFi pose models honestly — camera-supervised (MediaPipe + CSI) and camera-free (WiFlow), always checked against the mean-pose baseline before any PCK is quoted.
experiment-audit
A review step that checks whether an experiment's reported results are supported by real data and a sufficiently broad test.
i4h-catheter-navigation-e2e
End-to-end smoke for catheter navigation covering setup, digital twin, DRR, and unit tests. Use when asked to run the full catheter workflow smoke or demo the v0.7 pipeline.
feature-loop
Coding agent for the project-level harness — one feature per session, must verify, must be mergeable.
brooks-test
Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow…
software-code-refactoring
Improve production code quality while preserving all existing test behavior. Commonly used for the Refactor phase of TDD red-green-refactor, but applicable to any codebase with tests. Use when production code works but needs cleanup — reducing duplication, improving naming, simplifying complexity, aligning with…