Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aliengiraffe/vigilante --skill vigilante-issue-implementation-on-rushgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aliengiraffe/vigilanteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aliengiraffe/vigilante/vigilante-issue-implementation-on-rush)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aliengiraffe/vigilante/vigilante-issue-implementation-on-rush"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aliengiraffe/vigilante/vigilante-issue-implementation-on-rush/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aliengiraffe/vigilante/vigilante-issue-implementation-on-rush"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aliengiraffe/vigilante/vigilante-issue-implementation-on-rush.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00302 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00121 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00060 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
vigilante-issue-implementation-on-rush scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to vigilante-issue-implementation-on-gradle — 10 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Vigilante Rush Issue Implementation
Focus
- Read the prompt for the detected stack, workspace hints, and shared local-service contract before changing code.
- Limit edits and validation to the affected Rush projects unless broader changes are required.
- If local services are required, call
vigilante-local-service-dependenciesfirst and then use the shareddocker-compose-launchcontract instead of writing ad hoc Compose logic.
Workflow
- Follow the base
vigilante-issue-implementation-on-monorepoworkflow for issue comments, validation, push, and PR creation, including stacked base-branch detection (Base branch:directive in the issue body). - Use
vigilante commitfor all commit-producing operations. Do not usegit commitor GitHub CLI commit flows directly. - Any commit or amend must preserve the user's existing git author, committer, and signing configuration. Commit on behalf of the user and do not overwrite
git configwith a coding-agent identity. - Do not add
Co-authored by:trailers or any other agent attribution for Codex, Claude, Gemini, or similar coding-agent identities. - Use Rush-native workspace commands when they exist and match the touched projects.
- Keep service startup scoped to the assigned worktree and only for implementation or test dependencies.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 20 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 5e8eb47ebde0
vigilante-issue-implementation-on-rush is a skill published in the GitHub repository aliengiraffe/vigilante (41 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 302 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to vigilante-issue-implementation-on-gradle, differing in 10 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
pipeline-conductor
Operating procedure for the kirocrew-pipeline-conductor agent. Use when a pipeline conductor session is seeded, inspected or debugged. You MANAGE one issue/PR pipeline on one repo: two columns per item (session working? item solved?), send intent, never re-derive a red yourself.
bmad-correct-course
Assess the impact of a significant change during sprint execution across the PRD, epics, architecture, and UX documents, and produce a sprint change proposal. Use when the user says "correct course" or "propose sprint change".
bmad-ticket
Create and manage tickets — initiatives, epics, stories, bugs. Use when the user says "create a new initiative", "slice this initiative", "split this epic up", "break this into stories", "incept this epic", "make a ticket", "refine this ticket", "what's ready", "status of a story", "publish ticket changes", "validate…
bmad-retrospective
Review a finished epic folder in the ticket tree against the evidence it left behind — the epic file, each ticket plan, diffs, commits — and produce a retrospective with sourced findings, action items, and an acceptance decision. Use when the user says "run a retrospective" or "lets retro the epic [epic]". Supports…
bmad-walkthrough
Guide a human review of a commit, PR, file, or directory. Use when invoked by name.
kano-backlog
Prioritize and refine a GitHub Issues backlog with the Kano model — categorize every open issue as Must-be, Performance, Attractive, Indifferent, or Reverse, apply Kano + priority labels back to GitHub automatically, and recommend the single best next issue to pick up. Use this whenever the user wants to triage…