Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aliengiraffe/vigilante --skill vigilante-issue-implementation-on-rustgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aliengiraffe/vigilanteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aliengiraffe/vigilante/vigilante-issue-implementation-on-rust)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aliengiraffe/vigilante/vigilante-issue-implementation-on-rust"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aliengiraffe/vigilante/vigilante-issue-implementation-on-rust/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aliengiraffe/vigilante/vigilante-issue-implementation-on-rust"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aliengiraffe/vigilante/vigilante-issue-implementation-on-rust.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to low
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- low Excessive Agency · line 15 Skill's behavior or capabilities extend beyond its stated purpose. Scope creep allows an agent to perform actions unrelated to its documented functionality, increasing the attack surface.Fix: Limit the skill's scope to its documented purpose. Remove instructions that enable the agent to perform actions outside its stated functionality.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00800 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00400 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00160 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
vigilante-issue-implementation-on-rust scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 38 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Vigilante Rust Issue Implementation
Focus
- Read the prompt for detected tech stacks, process hints, and Rust security guidance before changing code.
- Follow idiomatic Rust conventions and keep changes scoped to the issue rather than broad cleanup.
- Preserve repository-specific toolchain, workspace, lint, and MSRV constraints when they are defined.
Rust Tooling Workflow
- Formatting: run
cargo fmton touched Rust code before committing. Respectrustfmt.tomlwhen present and do not hand-format Rust code. - Testing: run targeted
cargo testcommands for the affected crate, package, or workspace member first, then broaden scope only when changes cross crate boundaries or the correct target is unclear. Respect repository feature flags and default workspace behavior. - Linting: run
cargo clippywhen it is available and relevant to the changed Rust code. Prefer the repository's existing Clippy configuration and fix meaningful warnings instead of suppressing them broadly. - Security and supply-chain checks: run
cargo-auditorcargo denywhen those tools are already installed or configured and the change touches dependencies or security-sensitive code. If they are unavailable, note that and continue with the repository's existing validation rather than fabricating output. - Dependencies: keep dependency additions minimal, review default features carefully, and prefer the Rust standard library when it covers the need. Respect
Cargo.lock, workspace dependency policy, and any MSRV or toolchain pinning before introducing new crates or language features.
Rust Safety and Code Quality
- Keep
unsafecode minimal, justified, and tightly scoped. Do not introduceunsafewhen a safe standard approach is available. - Prefer returning
Resultand propagating errors cleanly over panicking in normal control flow. - Use feature flags deliberately. Avoid enabling broad optional features unless the issue requires them.
- Respect existing lint levels and crate-level policies such as
#![forbid(unsafe_code)],#![deny(warnings)], or repository-specific Clippy settings.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 38 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 6d4b70345d62
vigilante-issue-implementation-on-rust is a skill published in the GitHub repository aliengiraffe/vigilante (40 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 800 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pipeline-conductor
Operating procedure for the kirocrew-pipeline-conductor agent - run one issue/PR pipeline on one repository as a supervised fleet. Auto-pick items, preflight every candidate to one deterministic claim verdict, stand up one worker session per item in a dedicated folder, probe them each cycle with one script call…
release-notes
Draft a release note section from a commit range, grouped by what the reader gets.
shipping-a-pr
Use when finished work needs to ship as a pull request, or when the ask is about a PR — creating one, bringing it up to date, adding screenshots, watching its checks, or addressing its review comments. Not for reviewing a PR you are not shipping.
prepare-pr
End-to-end drives working-tree changes to a review-ready pull request — commit, sync base, squash to one commit, open/update the PR — then KEEPS RUNNING IN-SESSION (poll CI + code-review bots in 5-min rounds, up to 10) fixing every legitimate Critical/High finding and build failure until the PR is review-ready (never…
kirocrew-worktree-dev
HARD RULE for developing the Kiro Crew source repo ITSELF (not for users' own projects): every change is built and verified inside a git worktree, never against the live gateway. Covers worktree creation, the blocking local build gates (pytest + isort + flake8 + mypy + tsc + vitest), the built-dist gotcha, feature…
git-commit-helper
Generate conventional commit messages automatically. Use when user runs git commit, stages changes, or asks for commit message help. Analyzes git diff to create clear, descriptive conventional commit messages. Triggers on git commit, staged changes, commit message requests.