literature-review

Literature Review (arXiv)

Overview

Turn a research topic into a synthesized, cited review: search arXiv, read a focused set of key papers in chunks, and organize findings by theme. Built on the arxiv-toolkit (arxiv-mcp tools, or the arxiv CLI as a fallback).

Core principle: narrow and synthesize. Read a right-sized set of papers well, organized by theme — not a paper-by-paper dump, and not 80 tool calls.

When to use

• "Review the literature on X" / "survey of X" / "related work for X"
• "What's the state of the art / recent advances in X?"
• Orienting in a new area, or drafting a related-work section.

Prerequisite: the arxiv-mcp server is registered (the five tools below), or the arxiv CLI is installed.

Workflow

1. Scope first — do not skip. Before any search, settle: the key terms, the likely arXiv categories (e.g. cs.CL, cs.LG — see references/arxiv-query-syntax.md), the time window, and the depth. If the request is broad, ask ONE scoping question: a quick orientation (~5 papers), a standard review (~8–12), or exhaustive? Diving in without this wastes dozens of calls.

2. Discover. arxiv_search with field scoping (category, title, abstract) and the right sort — relevance for foundational work, submittedDate for the recent frontier. Run 2–3 complementary searches (broad terms; a title-scoped pass for surveys; a recent-sorted pass). If total is large or hints fire, narrow by category/date — never blind-paginate with start.

3. Triage. arxiv_get_metadata(ids, bibtex: true) on the candidates. Rank by fit + recency. Pick a deep-read set sized to the scope (default 5–8); list the rest as "also relevant."

4. Read — targeted, not exhaustive. For each chosen paper, read the abstract, then only the sections that matter (usually method + results) via arxiv_read_paper(section=…), or maxChars + nextCursor to walk a long section. After each paper, distill to 3–5 notes (contribution, method, result, limitation) and drop the raw text. Don't read every section of every paper.