Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aliildan/arxiv-toolkit --skill literature-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aliildan/arxiv-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aliildan/arxiv-toolkit/literature-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aliildan/arxiv-toolkit/literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aliildan/arxiv-toolkit/literature-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aliildan/arxiv-toolkit/literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aliildan/arxiv-toolkit/literature-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.01044 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00522 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00209 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00104 |
Grade A, and why
literature-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Literature Review (arXiv)
Overview
Turn a research topic into a synthesized, cited review: search arXiv, read a focused set of key papers in chunks, and organize findings by theme. Built on the arxiv-toolkit (arxiv-mcp tools, or the arxiv CLI as a fallback).
Core principle: narrow and synthesize. Read a right-sized set of papers well, organized by theme — not a paper-by-paper dump, and not 80 tool calls.
When to use
- "Review the literature on X" / "survey of X" / "related work for X"
- "What's the state of the art / recent advances in X?"
- Orienting in a new area, or drafting a related-work section.
Prerequisite: the arxiv-mcp server is registered (the five tools below), or the arxiv CLI is installed.
Workflow
1. Scope first — do not skip. Before any search, settle: the key terms, the likely arXiv categories (e.g. cs.CL, cs.LG — see references/arxiv-query-syntax.md), the time window, and the depth. If the request is broad, ask ONE scoping question: a quick orientation (~5 papers), a standard review (~8–12), or exhaustive? Diving in without this wastes dozens of calls.
2. Discover. arxiv_search with field scoping (category, title, abstract) and the right sort — relevance for foundational work, submittedDate for the recent frontier. Run 2–3 complementary searches (broad terms; a title-scoped pass for surveys; a recent-sorted pass). If total is large or hints fire, narrow by category/date — never blind-paginate with start.
3. Triage. arxiv_get_metadata(ids, bibtex: true) on the candidates. Rank by fit + recency. Pick a deep-read set sized to the scope (default 5–8); list the rest as "also relevant."
4. Read — targeted, not exhaustive. For each chosen paper, read the abstract, then only the sections that matter (usually method + results) via arxiv_read_paper(section=…), or maxChars + nextCursor to walk a long section. After each paper, distill to 3–5 notes (contribution, method, result, limitation) and drop the raw text. Don't read every section of every paper.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 59 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A a63ec3e2c9c6
literature-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository aliildan/arxiv-toolkit (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 1,044 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
instrument-data-to-allotrope
Convert laboratory instrument output files (PDF, CSV, Excel, TXT) to Allotrope Simple Model (ASM) JSON format or flattened 2D CSV. Use this skill when scientists need to standardize instrument data for LIMS systems, data lakes, or downstream analysis. Supports auto-detection of instrument types. Outputs include full…
exploratory-data-analysis
Perform bounded, local exploratory analysis of explicitly supported scientific files. Use for redacted CSV/TSV/JSON profiles; optional NumPy, HDF5, FASTA/FASTQ, and basic image metadata inspection; missingness/leakage audits; outlier and transformation sensitivity; and rigorous EDA report scaffolds. Other domain…
matlab
Build, review, migrate, and safely plan MATLAB or GNU Octave numerical workflows, including arrays, tabular/time data, tests, projects, graphics, MAT files, and explicit Python interoperability.
phylogenetics
Build and analyze phylogenetic trees using MAFFT (multiple alignment), IQ-TREE 2 (maximum likelihood), and FastTree (fast NJ/ML). Visualize with ETE3 or FigTree. For evolutionary analysis, microbial genomics, viral phylodynamics, protein family analysis, and molecular clock studies.
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
mapping-to-snomed
Maps clinical concept spans extracted by OpenMed to SNOMED CT concepts through a USER-SUPPLIED terminology server (the user's own Ontoserver, Snowstorm, or UMLS/UTS), never a bundled vocabulary. Use when the user wants to code findings, disorders, procedures, body structures, or substances to SNOMED CT, run an ECL…