Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-code-tresor --skill test-generatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-code-tresorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alirezarezvani/claude-code-tresor/test-generator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alirezarezvani/claude-code-tresor/test-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alirezarezvani/claude-code-tresor/test-generator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alirezarezvani/claude-code-tresor/test-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alirezarezvani/claude-code-tresor/test-generator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Rogue Agent · line 225 Skill modifies its own code, configuration, or behavior at runtime. Self-modification enables an agent to escalate privileges, disable safety constraints, or install persistent backdoors.Fix: Prevent the skill from modifying its own code, SKILL.md, or configuration files. Treat skill files as read-only at runtime.
- medium Rogue Agent · line 9 Skill establishes unauthorized persistence across sessions via cron jobs, startup scripts, or state files. Session persistence allows an attacker to maintain access beyond the current interaction.Fix: Remove any persistence mechanisms (cron jobs, startup scripts, state files). Skills should not maintain state across sessions without explicit user consent.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.01558 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00623 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00312 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00156 |
Grade A, and why
test-generator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 255 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Generator Skill
Auto-suggest tests when you write new code.
When I Activate
- ✅ New function created
- ✅ New component added
- ✅ User mentions testing or tests
- ✅ Test file missing for implementation
- ✅ User asks "can you test this?"
What I Generate
Quick Test Scaffolding
- Basic happy path tests
- Null/undefined edge cases
- Simple error scenarios
- Framework-appropriate syntax (Jest/Vitest/Pytest)
What I Don't Do
- Comprehensive test suites → Use @test-engineer sub-agent
- Integration tests → Use @test-engineer sub-agent
- E2E test design → Use @test-engineer sub-agent
- Test strategy planning → Use @test-engineer sub-agent
Relationship with @test-engineer Sub-Agent
Me (Skill): Quick test scaffolding @test-engineer (Sub-Agent): Comprehensive testing strategy
Workflow
- You write a function
- I auto-generate basic test structure
- You want full suite → Invoke @test-engineer sub-agent
- Sub-agent creates comprehensive tests
Examples
JavaScript Function
// You write:
function calculateDiscount(price, percentage) {
if (price <= 0) throw new Error('Invalid price');
return price * (percentage / 100);
}
// I auto-generate:
describe('calculateDiscount', () => {
it('calculates discount correctly', () => {
expect(calculateDiscount(100, 10)).toBe(10);
});
it('throws error for invalid price', () => {
expect(() => calculateDiscount(0, 10)).toThrow('Invalid price');
});
it('handles zero percentage', () => {
expect(calculateDiscount(100, 0)).toBe(0);
});
// TODO: Add more edge cases
// Consider: negative percentages, decimal values, very large numbers
});
React Component
// You write:
function UserCard({ user, onEdit }) {
return (
<div className="user-card">
<h2>{user.name}</h2>
<button onClick={() => onEdit(user.id)}>Edit</button>
</div>
);
}
// I auto-generate:
import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react';
describe('UserCard', () => {
const mockUser = { id: 1, name: 'John Doe' };
const mockOnEdit = jest.fn();
it('renders user name', () => {
render(<UserCard user={mockUser} onEdit={mockOnEdit} />);
expect(screen.getByText('John Doe')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
it('calls onEdit with user id when button clicked', () => {
render(<UserCard user={mockUser} onEdit={mockOnEdit} />);
fireEvent.click(screen.getByText('Edit'));
expect(mockOnEdit).toHaveBeenCalledWith(1);
});
// TODO: Add tests for edge cases
// - Missing user data
// - Undefined onEdit
// - Long names (UI testing)
});
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 255 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 2c749a7179d0
test-generator is a skill published in the GitHub repository alirezarezvani/claude-code-tresor (783 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 1,558 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
skillspec-test
Execute test blocks from a SkillSpec .agent file.
python-testing
Guidelines for writing and running tests in the Agent Framework Python codebase. Use this when creating, modifying, or running tests.
writing-tests
Kiro Crew repo only: how to write a backend pytest test with NO side effects that does not flake. Use when adding, editing, reviewing or debugging a test there: which conftest applies, what leaks (temp dirs, data home, /.kiro, cron, threads), the seven flake classes, cross-platform traps.
dashboard-template
Kiro Crew repo only: load this when a task will author or change a dashboard page. A page never ships alone: the same PR carries its TypedDict contract, its provider, and a parity test that the two agree. Scaffold all four from one field list; read numbers from an existing fold, never type them.
spec-execution
6-phase iterative specification execution workflow covering implementation, testing, review, improvement, commit, and progress tracking with quality-gated convergence.
quality-checklist
Validate implementation quality through custom checklists, scoring against constitution standards, specification coverage, and producing remediation recommendations.