studio-feedback

studio-feedback is a skill for Claude Code from AlpacaLabsLLC/skills-for-architects. It costs 61 tokens per session (1,273 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A report-preparation tool for turning a reviewed Architecture Studio problem into a GitHub bug report or feature request. GitHub is a service where software projects track issues and requests.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to document a broken skill, report unexpected behavior, or propose a new capability.
Why use it?
It keeps the report focused on the information maintainers need and shows what would be shared before opening GitHub.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions .claude-plugin; names the AskUserQuestion tool; mentions Claude Code.

Needs its repository: it reads a path above its own folder, which exists only inside the repository. The line is Host adapter: read [delivery-specific guidance](../../docs/host-adapters.md) for invocation, metadata access, questions and browser opening..

Part of the as plugin — 61 skills, 8 agents, 2 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it to document a broken skill, report unexpected behavior, or propose a new capability.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AlpacaLabsLLC/skills-for-architects
agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/alpacalabsllc/skills-for-architects/studio-feedback

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install as, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 61 skills, 8 agents, 2 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for studio-feedback

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alpacalabsllc/skills-for-architects/studio-feedback/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alpacalabsllc/skills-for-architects/studio-feedback)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alpacalabsllc/skills-for-architects/studio-feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alpacalabsllc/skills-for-architects/studio-feedback/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for studio-feedback

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alpacalabsllc/skills-for-architects/studio-feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alpacalabsllc/skills-for-architects/studio-feedback.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 61 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,273 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00061 $0.01273
Opus 5.5 $0.00024 $0.00509
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00255
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00127

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 4672d25ddbfc, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

studio-feedback scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/studio-feedback/SKILL.md · 87 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/as:studio-feedback — Prepare a GitHub report

Before acting, read the host contract and this component's declaration (skill:studio-feedback). Load only its referenced mode profiles from the shared catalog. Compose modes required by the actual task; declarations are requirements, not proof of access or permission.

Host adapter: read delivery-specific guidance for invocation, metadata access, questions and browser opening.

This native report-preparation procedure has no registered operation IDs. Its steps below are the complete owner; no Arch Studio runner, installer, executable download or reconstructed helper is required. An ordinary native encoding or metadata tool may be used where available. Follow the completion contract and distinguish a prepared draft, an opened URL and a submitted issue.

Prepare a report locally, show exactly what would leave the machine, and open GitHub only after one informed confirmation. Never submit the issue, post a comment, call the GitHub API, or transmit diagnostics in the background.

1. Choose the report type

Infer bug or feature when the request is clear. Otherwise use one AskUserQuestion gate to choose the type; do not first ask the same question in prose.

Use these issue forms and labels:

  • Bug: bug-report.yml, label bug; fields version, os, skill, what-happened, expected.
  • Feature: feature-request.yml, label enhancement; fields version, skill, problem, proposal.

2. Prepare minimal fields locally

For MCP, use the actual delivered release version and digest when present; a connection does not imply a local plugin path. For an installed plugin, read its actual .codex-plugin/plugin.json on Codex or .claude-plugin/plugin.json on Claude Code through the host's known package location. Gather only the operating-system name/version through available native host metadata or a bounded local command. Process access is optional and depends on that method. If metadata is unavailable, say unknown rather than searching unrelated files, installing tools or inventing it. Infer the affected skill from the conversation when reliable; otherwise leave it blank or ask during editing.

Read the full file on GitHub · 87 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed · +12 lines 4672d25ddbfc
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 75 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 6620966692c0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

studio-feedback is a skill published in the GitHub repository AlpacaLabsLLC/skills-for-architects (395 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 1,273 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

technical-roadmap-planning

Gathers inputs, defines initiatives, prioritises with an impact/effort matrix, sequences dependencies, and produces a roadmap table. Invoked when the user asks to plan a technical roadmap, prioritise engineering initiatives, or create a quarter/half-year engineering plan.

soulcodex/agentic · 59 tokens

github-issue-planning

Issue-backed plan persistence on GitHub via one managed issue comment with an idempotent marker. Prefers GitHub MCP when available and falls back to gh CLI when MCP is unavailable or misconfigured. Uses local plan persistence only when issue persistence is unavailable or not desired.

soulcodex/agentic · 62 tokens

cre-development

CRE Development and Construction suite - 8 specialist skills for U.S. site/entitlement screening, budget and yield-on-cost, construction loan sizing, GC contracts, draw review, schedule risk, lease-up pro forma, and IC memo writing.

ahacker-1/cre-agent-skills · 52 tokens

module-federation-ssr

Add, review, or debug server-side rendered Module Federation applications, including Modern.js, Nuxt, Next.js legacy Pages Router, Vinext, Vite SSR, and dual browser/server remote artifacts.

soulcodex/agentic · 48 tokens

sparc-pipeline

Use when you need to run the full 5-phase SPARC methodology (Specification→Pseudocode→Architecture→Refinement→Completion) for a complex feature. Each phase has explicit done-criteria gates.

mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP-PUBLIC · 47 tokens

codex-symphony

Install and operate a portable OpenAI Symphony + Linear orchestration setup in any Git repository. Use when the user wants a one-command local Symphony runner, a reusable WORKFLOW template, background launch scripts, or a Codex wrapper that restarts Symphony automatically when reopening the CLI.

citedy/skills · 61 tokens