nexus-gateway: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/project-review/SKILL.md

project-review is a skill for Claude Code from AlphaBitCore/nexus-gateway. It costs 72 tokens per session (3,405 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A structured review process for checking an AI gateway from nine specialist viewpoints, including its dashboard, client, API, security, and compliance.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for a full-system audit before release, or when you need to inspect security, compliance, architecture, interfaces, and user-facing parts together.
Why use it?
It helps uncover problems that a review by one person or one team might miss. Findings are organized by severity and followed through the project's normal design, coding, testing, and verification steps.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

This is AlphaBitCore/nexus-gateway's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on nexus-gateway itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything nexus-gateway configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to AlphaBitCore/nexus-gateway. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlphaBitCore/nexus-gateway/main/.claude/skills/project-review/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AlphaBitCore/nexus-gateway

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for project-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alphabitcore/nexus-gateway/project-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alphabitcore/nexus-gateway/project-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alphabitcore/nexus-gateway/project-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alphabitcore/nexus-gateway/project-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for project-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alphabitcore/nexus-gateway/project-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alphabitcore/nexus-gateway/project-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 72 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,405 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00072 $0.03405
Opus 5 $0.00036 $0.01702
Sonnet 5 $0.00014 $0.00681
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00341

Measured 10d ago against content hash 77208346e418, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

project-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/project-review/SKILL.md · 473 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 473 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Multi-Role Review Prompt Guide


Overview

This guide contains review prompts for 9 specialist roles, designed for a full-system audit of the AI Gateway (Admin Dashboard, client, API, architecture, security, compliance, etc.).

Findings from every role must be remediated through the standard implementation workflow:

Architecture → Requirements → SDD → OpenAPI Spec → Code → Unit Tests → Verification

Common review standards

The three items below are mandatory defaults for every role prompt and are embedded in each role's execution flow.


1. Enable extended thinking

Use extended thinking to reason through all findings before responding.

Before producing any finding, Claude must internally reason through:

  • The root cause and impact chain of the issue
  • Cross-module and cross-role ripple effects
  • Edge cases and underlying assumptions
  • Feasibility and side effects of the proposed fix

2. Severity-ordered output

Every finding must be classified and ordered by the levels below:

Level Marker Definition
Critical 🚨 Systemic risk affecting core function or security; fix immediately
High 🔴 Important missing function or severe UX issue; fix in the current iteration
Medium 🟡 Incomplete function or sub-optimal UX; fix in an upcoming iteration
Low 🟢 Optimization; add to the backlog for opportunistic pickup

Output order: Critical → High → Medium → Low.


3. JIRA-ready ticket format

Every finding must be rendered in the format below:

───────────────────────────────────────────
JIRA TICKET
───────────────────────────────────────────
Title        : [role-prefix]-[number] short problem title
Type         : Gap / Issue / Improvement
Severity     : Critical / High / Medium / Low
Role         : the review role that surfaced the issue

Description  :
  [Clearly describe current behavior, trigger conditions, and context]

Impact       :
  [Describe the impact on users, business, and the system]

Fix Plan     :
  1. Architecture — [architecture-level response]
  2. Requirements — [additions needed in the requirements doc]
  3. SDD          — [updates needed in the software design doc]
  4. OpenAPI      — [API spec changes]
  5. Code         — [implementation guidance and gotchas]
  6. Unit Tests   — [test cases that must be covered]
  7. Verification — [acceptance criteria and verification methods]

Acceptance Criteria :
  - [ ] Condition 1
  - [ ] Condition 2
  - [ ] Condition 3

Estimated Effort : [X] Story Points  |  about [X] person-days
───────────────────────────────────────────

Read the full file on GitHub · 473 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 473 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A 77208346e418

Subscribe to this mod's changes

project-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository AlphaBitCore/nexus-gateway (23 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 3,405 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

audit-expert

Expert-level security auditing, compliance, code review, and vulnerability assessment. Use when the user mentions compliance, security review, code review, vulnerability assessment, SOC 2, or GDPR, or when the task involves Audit Types, Audit Frameworks, Audit Process, or Authentication Review.

personamanagmentlayer/pcl · 60 tokens

defenseclaw-ops

Manage DefenseClaw enterprise security - scan components, manage tool permissions, view alerts, configure guardrails.

automateyournetwork/netclaw · 27 tokens

soc2-expert

Expert in SOC 2 compliance, trust service criteria, audit preparation, controls implementation, and security frameworks. Use when the user mentions compliance, audit, trust services, AICPA, controls, or security framework, or when the task involves Trust Service Criteria, SOC 2 Types, Security Common Criteria, or…

personamanagmentlayer/pcl · 71 tokens

mariana-audit

Full-depth audit (a11y, UX, perf, SEO, security, DB, architecture, legal compliance, ops, observability) of a project. Audits by reading the source directly — installs nothing, writes nothing outside docs/audits/. Reports findings with file:line evidence and calibrated severity, optionally mitigates as discovered. Use…

ibaifernandez/mariana-audit · 111 tokens

audit

A guide to Linux security auditing, which records selected system and user actions for investigation and compliance checks. It uses auditd, Linux's system auditing service.

chaterm/terminal-skills · 5 tokens

ai-identity-platform

Structured identity management for AI agent fleets — define, govern, and audit agent personas at scale.

live-neon/persona-mcp · 23 tokens