Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/alphalab-ustc/ohmycode/gen-testsnpx skills add AlphaLab-USTC/OhMyCode --skill gen-testsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AlphaLab-USTC/OhMyCodeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00031 | $0.01596 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00798 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00319 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00160 |
Grade A, and why
gen-tests scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 188 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Generate Tests for OhMyCode
Generate project-convention-compliant tests for a given module or file.
This skill is part of the OhMyCode development closed-loop:
编码 ──→ /gen-tests ──→ /run-tests ──→ 分析失败 ──→ 修代码 ──╮
↑ │
╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
After generating tests, always proceed to /run-tests to verify them.
When to Use
- User says "gen tests", "write tests", "add tests for …"
- User provides a module name or file path (e.g.,
ohmycode/tools/bash.py,core/loop) - As part of the development loop: just finished writing/modifying source code and need tests
Input
$ARGUMENTS — module name or file path to test (e.g., ohmycode/tools/bash.py, core/loop, providers/anthropic).
If $ARGUMENTS is empty, ask the user which module to generate tests for.
Step 1 — Resolve Target
Map the argument to a source file path:
| Argument form | Resolved source path |
|---|---|
ohmycode/tools/bash.py |
use as-is |
tools/bash |
ohmycode/tools/bash.py |
core/loop |
ohmycode/core/loop.py |
providers/openai |
ohmycode/providers/openai.py |
config |
ohmycode/config/config.py |
Read the resolved source file. Identify:
- Public classes / functions (skip
_privateunless critical) - Async vs sync interfaces
- External dependencies (API calls, file I/O, subprocesses)
- Branch paths (if/else, error returns, edge cases)
Step 2 — Read Existing Test Patterns
-
Read
tests/conftest.pyto learn available fixtures:MockProvider— fake LLM that yields configurable responses, use for anything touching providersmock_provider— fixture returning a defaultMockProvider()mock_config— minimal config dicttmp_dir— alias fortmp_path, use for file-based tests
-
Check for existing test file at the mirror path (see Step 4 path rule). If it exists, read it to understand current coverage and style — extend rather than overwrite.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 188 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 428ea9e8fd89
gen-tests is a skill published in the GitHub repository AlphaLab-USTC/OhMyCode (131 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 1,596 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…