Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to AltimateAI/altimate-code. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AltimateAI/altimate-code/main/.opencode/skills/data-parity/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AltimateAI/altimate-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/altimateai/altimate-code/data-parity)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/altimateai/altimate-code/data-parity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/altimateai/altimate-code/data-parity/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/altimateai/altimate-code/data-parity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/altimateai/altimate-code/data-parity.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 432 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 438 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.04920 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.01968 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00984 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00492 |
Grade A, and why
data-parity scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 493 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Data Parity (Table Diff)
CRITICAL: Regulated / Sensitive Data
data_diff includes up to 5 sample diff rows in the tool output so you can see which values differ. Those rows are part of the conversation and are sent to the LLM provider you're using.
Before running data_diff against a table that might contain PII, PHI, PCI, or other regulated data:
- Ask the user whether the target contains regulated columns.
- If yes, prefer
algorithm: "profile"— it compares column-level statistics (count, nulls, min/max, distinct count) without any row values leaving the database. - If a row-level diff is genuinely required, tell the user that up to 5 sample rows will be sent to the LLM and get explicit approval before calling the tool.
- Consider scoping with
where_clauseto exclude sensitive customers/accounts first.
Default to profile mode whenever the table name suggests regulated data (customers, patients, orders, payments, accounts, users, etc.) unless the user explicitly requests row-level comparison.
CRITICAL: Always Start With a Plan
Before doing anything else, generate a numbered TODO list for the user:
Here's my plan:
1. [ ] List available warehouse connections
2. [ ] Inspect schema, discover primary key candidates, and detect auto-timestamp columns
3. [ ] Confirm primary keys with you
4. [ ] Confirm which auto-timestamp columns to exclude
5. [ ] Check row counts on both sides
6. [ ] Run column-level profile (cheap — no row scan)
7. [ ] Ask whether to proceed with row-level diff (may be expensive for large tables)
8. [ ] Run targeted row-level diff on diverging columns only
9. [ ] Present findings with scope, filters, time period, columns compared/excluded, and assumptions
Update each item to [x] as you complete it. This plan should be visible before any tool is called.
CRITICAL: Use data_diff Tool — Never Write Manual Diff SQL
NEVER write SQL to diff tables manually (e.g., EXCEPT, FULL OUTER JOIN, MINUS).
ALWAYS use the data_diff tool for any comparison operation.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 493 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 797a60c19051
data-parity is a skill published in the GitHub repository AltimateAI/altimate-code (813 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 4,920 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-prs
Review a GitHub pull request in the googleapis/mcp-toolbox repo against the team's reviewer checklist: PR title/description conventions, linked issue, logic errors and unhandled edge cases, breaking changes, test coverage, docs updates, security (input handling), and new dependencies. Use whenever a maintainer asks…
fix-failing-tests
Diagnose a failing test in the googleapis/mcp-toolbox repo and land a fix by reasoning from the actual error: read the failure, reproduce it, shrink it until the cause is forced into the open, then fix the cause. Use this whenever a test or CI job is red, a build breaks after a change, many packages fail at once, or a…
reproduce-bug
Reproduce a reported bug in googleapis/mcp-toolbox and decide whether it is real, delivering an evidence-backed verdict: confirmed, already fixed, misconfiguration, client-side, works as intended, not reproducible, or blocked. Use whenever a maintainer asks you to reproduce, verify, confirm, or investigate a bug…
zarr-python
Chunked N-D arrays for cloud storage. Compressed arrays, parallel I/O, S3/GCS integration, NumPy/Dask/Xarray compatible, for large-scale scientific computing pipelines.
benchling-integration
Benchling R&D platform integration. Access registry (DNA, proteins), inventory, ELN entries, workflows via API, build Benchling Apps, query Data Warehouse, for lab data management automation.
aeon
This skill should be used for time series machine learning tasks including classification, regression, clustering, forecasting, anomaly detection, segmentation, and similarity search. Use when working with temporal data, sequential patterns, or time-indexed observations requiring specialized algorithms beyond standard…