bmad-review

bmad-review is a skill for Claude Code from alvin-reyes/better-agentic-ide. It costs 117 tokens per session (2,132 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

Runs one or more installed review lenses — adversarial critique, edge cases, verification gaps, structure, prose — and reports triaged findings. Use when, and only when, the user asks you to review a diff, a pull request, or an artifact — code or documents, one or many — and actually says "review"; an explicit…

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/alvin-reyes/better-agentic-ide/bmad-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add alvin-reyes/better-agentic-ide --skill bmad-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alvin-reyes/better-agentic-ide

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for bmad-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alvin-reyes/better-agentic-ide/bmad-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alvin-reyes/better-agentic-ide/bmad-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alvin-reyes/better-agentic-ide/bmad-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alvin-reyes/better-agentic-ide/bmad-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for bmad-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alvin-reyes/better-agentic-ide/bmad-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alvin-reyes/better-agentic-ide/bmad-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 117 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,132 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00117 $0.02132
Opus 5.5 $0.00047 $0.00853
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00023 $0.00426
Haiku 4.5 $0.00012 $0.00213

Measured today against content hash 8548ce982fdb, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

bmad-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 2 executable files (scripts/tests/test_word_metrics.py, scripts/word_metrics.py), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/bmad-review/SKILL.md · 55 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 55 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

BMad Review

Review content through lenses — each a distinct method and stance — and report findings in one canonical shape. Report what is real — never pad to look thorough. Each lens sets its own stance toward the content and toward zero findings: for most an empty result is valid; the adversarial lens requires at least ten concrete findings and treats an empty list as a signal to re-check; the editorial lenses hold content sacrosanct and critique only how it is organized and expressed.

The lens set is whatever {workflow.lenses} resolves to, not a fixed list — overrides add lenses and replace shipped ones. Never claim a capability from this file; read the resolved lenses and work from those.

Inputs

  • content — what to review: a diff, branch, uncommitted changes, file, spec, story, or any document. Args: [path].
  • lenses (optional) — one or more lens codes or names, however the caller expresses them: a spoken request, or a directive of the form skill:bmad-review lenses=<code>[,<code>...] (the form bmm's doc_standards uses). Default: every applicable lens (a full review).
  • also_consider (optional) — areas to keep in mind alongside each lens's normal analysis.
  • claims (optional) — the change's own narrative: the commit messages it covers, or whatever description of it the caller supplied. Goes to the edge-case lens alone.
  • pre-resolved customization (optional) — [workflow] field values supplied by a forwarding caller. See Execution step 1.

Conventions

  • Bare paths (e.g. references/lens-edge-case-hunter.md) resolve from {skill-root} — this skill's installed directory, where customize.toml lives. {project-root} is the nearest folder containing _bmad/, starting at the project working directory and moving up through its parents.
  • {workflow.<name>} resolves to fields in customize.toml's [workflow] table (overrides win per BMad merge rules).
  • In style_guide, review_guidance, and persistent_facts, a value prefixed file: is a path or glob — load that file's contents. If a file: value cannot be read, name the failed file in the output header and continue: the shipped baseline for style_guide, the remaining entries otherwise.

Read the full file on GitHub · 55 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 55 lines · 117 tokens per session scan A 8548ce982fdb

Subscribe to this mod's changes

bmad-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository alvin-reyes/better-agentic-ide (85 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 117 tokens to every session and 2,132 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-26.