Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add alyraffauf/hoenn --skill quality-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alyraffauf/hoennWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alyraffauf/hoenn/quality-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alyraffauf/hoenn/quality-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alyraffauf/hoenn/quality-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alyraffauf/hoenn/quality-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alyraffauf/hoenn/quality-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.01029 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00412 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00206 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
quality-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 69 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A e89ee4ee73bb
quality-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository alyraffauf/hoenn (235 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 1,029 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
github-issue
Use when the user wants to start work on a GitHub issue, set up a worktree and development environment, plan the implementation, write tests, and create a PR. Triggers: "start issue", "work on #123", "pick up issue 123", "new issue", or /github-issue [ISSUE].
review
Review a repository, pull or merge requests, branches, commit ranges, or local changes from first principles for correctness, conventions, design, tests, documentation, and security. Use for code review and audit requests, including requests to fix the findings or merge the reviewed PRs / MRs.
restart__pull_request
A pull-request restart workflow for replacing a messy review with a new pull request containing one clean commit and a summary of the earlier discussion.
rescue__pull_request_review
An automated workflow for handling GitHub pull-request review comments, applying requested code changes, committing them, and pushing them back.
validate__code_complexity
A quality check for code changes that measures how difficult source code is to understand and checks test coverage, the share of code exercised by tests.
monitor__pull_request_conflict
An automated check for GitHub pull requests, which are proposed code changes awaiting review or merging.