Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AmariahAK/atlarix-skills --skill acr-codequalitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AmariahAK/atlarix-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/amariahak/atlarix-skills/acr-codequality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/amariahak/atlarix-skills/acr-codequality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/amariahak/atlarix-skills/acr-codequality.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00003 | $0.00341 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00170 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00068 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
Code Quality Guidelines scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Quality Guidelines
When to use this skill
Code Quality Guidelines
Source
Synced from https://github.com/PatrickJS/awesome-cursorrules/tree/main/rules/codequality.mdc.
Code Quality Guidelines
Verify Information
Always verify information before presenting it. Do not make assumptions or speculate without clear evidence.
File-by-File Changes
Make changes file by file and give me a chance to spot mistakes.
No Apologies
Never use apologies.
No Understanding Feedback
Avoid giving feedback about understanding in comments or documentation.
No Whitespace Suggestions
Don't suggest whitespace changes.
No Summaries
Don't summarize changes made.
No Inventions
Don't invent changes other than what's explicitly requested.
No Unnecessary Confirmations
Don't ask for confirmation of information already provided in the context.
Preserve Existing Code
Don't remove unrelated code or functionalities. Pay attention to preserving existing structures.
Single Chunk Edits
Provide all edits in a single chunk instead of multiple-step instructions or explanations for the same file.
No Implementation Checks
Don't ask the user to verify implementations that are visible in the provided context.
No Unnecessary Updates
Don't suggest updates or changes to files when there are no actual modifications needed.
Provide Real File Links
Always provide links to the real files, not x.md.
No Current Implementation
Don't show or discuss the current implementation unless specifically requested.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 61 lines · 3 tokens per session scan A 02cf57d59da9
Code Quality Guidelines is a skill published in the GitHub repository AmariahAK/atlarix-skills (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 3 tokens to every session and 341 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
sol-luna-router
Route substantial coding or repository-review work through a two-stage Sol commander/verifier and separate Luna Max CLI worker. Use when the user explicitly asks Sol to direct or supervise Luna, explicitly requests this router, needs an isolated auditable Luna-owned implementation with a Sol review loop, or asks to…
idea-team
A structured group discussion for exploring a product idea through three roles: researcher, critic, and analogy finder. The roles look for evidence, weaknesses, and useful comparisons.
codebase-audit
A read-only method for auditing an entire codebase across contracts, data integrity, errors, security, architecture, technical debt, configuration, and caching. It produces prioritized findings and a repair roadmap.
codex-agent
Use when you want a second-opinion review via Codex CLI, cross-verification after another agent implements changes, debugging help, or alternative implementation proposals. Requires Codex CLI to be installed and authenticated.
project-health-auditor
Comprehensive codebase health analysis. Use when reviewing code quality, identifying technical debt, checking dependencies, or assessing project structure.
review-gate
Use before an agent-produced diff is committed, pushed, opened as a PR, merged, landed, or applied to user files when explicit implementation approval is missing. Trigger for review gate, review pack, approve before landing, diff first then land, human approval, merge gate, commit gate, push gate, or PR readiness.…