Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ameshkov/mcp-compress-router. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ameshkov/mcp-compress-router/master/.agents/skills/manual-test-run/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ameshkov/mcp-compress-routerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ameshkov/mcp-compress-router/manual-test-run)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ameshkov/mcp-compress-router/manual-test-run"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ameshkov/mcp-compress-router/manual-test-run/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ameshkov/mcp-compress-router/manual-test-run"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ameshkov/mcp-compress-router/manual-test-run.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01777 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00711 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00355 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00178 |
Grade A, and why
manual-test-run scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 164 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Running Manual QA Tests
Overview
Run the project's manual Gherkin plans (qa/features/) and record
verdicts with the BDD runner (qa/scripts/bdd/). The plans execute
inside the QA Docker workspace built from qa/Dockerfile, never from
a host checkout. This skill covers only the BDD workflow — enumerating
cases, executing them, and producing a report. Every stack detail
(fixtures, preparation, and the commands that drive the system under
test) lives in qa/README.md.
Prerequisites
- The repository contains the manual QA stack:
qa/README.md,qa/features/, andqa/scripts/bdd/. - Docker is available: the plans run in the QA workspace built from
qa/Dockerfile, not in a host checkout. - Read
qa/README.mdbefore executing anything. It is the source of truth for fixtures, setup, and the exact commands and paths the scenarios name. Where this skill and the README disagree, the README wins. - If
qa/README.mdis missing, STOP: tell the user the manual QA stack is not present in this repository and wait. Do not improvise a setup or reconstruct commands from this skill.
Where things live
qa/features/— the Gherkin plans, one file per area. A scenario's steps are instructions a tester carries out.qa/scripts/bdd/— the BDD runner (enumerate, walk, record) and the@TC-*ID check.qa/README.md— the technical source of truth: test fixtures (configs, mock servers, router homes, host configs), preparation, and the commands the plans use.qa/output/<run-id>/— generated reports (report.jsonandreport.md); gitignored.
When this applies
- "Run the manual tests for this change"
- "Run the recommended cases" (a list chosen by
qa-test-planning) - "Execute
<feature>/<case-id>" - "Produce a QA run report"
Step 0 — Prepare the stack
Read qa/README.md and carry out its preparation and preflight
exactly as written: build the Compose stack, start it, and open a
shell in the workspace container. This skill deliberately does not
repeat those commands: when the stack changes, the README is updated
with it.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 164 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A baf2723138b0
manual-test-run is a skill published in the GitHub repository ameshkov/mcp-compress-router (21 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,777 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-22.
Other skills, from other repositories
flutter-mcp-toolkit-control
Drive a running Flutter app — tap, scroll, type, fill forms, hot-reload, navigate. Use when you need to interact with the UI.
flutter-mcp-e2e-harness
Use this skill when writing or running repeatable E2E scenarios for Flutter apps as checked-in Dart with the fluttermcpharness package (packages/harness) — build/launch the app, attach to its VM service, drive widgets (snapshot/tap/enter text) and assert without MCP; also covers the repo showcase launcher (make…
flutter-mcp-cli-runtime-validation
Run Flutter MCP runtime validation from CLI in two steps (launch app, then run validate-runtime), including toolkit-extension gating, screenshot/layout capture, app error collection, optional reload verification, and retry handling for transient first-connect failures.
testing-assistant
Manages testing lifecycle including unit tests, integration tests, validation, and quality assurance.
ui-aqa-flow
Workflow for automated QA: integration and end-to-end UI test automation, page objects, etc.
qa-knowledge
To run QA engineering — requirements/gap analysis, scenario & spec design, test implementation, failure triage — over the QA knowledge base.