coding-workflow

coding-workflow is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from AmineDjeghri/personal-os-setup. It costs 46 tokens per session (655 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A shared set of rules for coding tasks across multiple repositories. It assigns work between Hermes and Claude Code, requires a plan and approval before changes, and defines review and pull-request steps.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps start coding tasks, inspect repository instructions, plan changes, delegate work, review edits, and prepare repository-specific pull requests.
Why use it?
It prevents agents from editing the wrong place, acting without approval, or skipping important review and repository procedures.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions Claude Code.

Good fit It helps start coding tasks, inspect repository instructions, plan changes, delegate work, review edits, and prepare repository-specific pull requests.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/aminedjeghri/personal-os-setup/coding-workflow
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add AmineDjeghri/personal-os-setup --skill coding-workflow
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AmineDjeghri/personal-os-setup

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for coding-workflow

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aminedjeghri/personal-os-setup/coding-workflow/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aminedjeghri/personal-os-setup/coding-workflow)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aminedjeghri/personal-os-setup/coding-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aminedjeghri/personal-os-setup/coding-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for coding-workflow

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aminedjeghri/personal-os-setup/coding-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aminedjeghri/personal-os-setup/coding-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 46 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 655 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00046 $0.00655
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.00328
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00131
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00065

Measured today against content hash d6e2fd22ca95, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

coding-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

src/personal_os_setup/config/chezmoi/dot_claude/skills/coding-workflow/SKILL.md · 48 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 48 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Coding Workflow — Hermes & Claude Code

Shared workflow rules for coding tasks. Both agents read this skill; rules are agent-agnostic (terminal/git/gh only).

1. Division of labor

Task Agent
Home Assistant, Hermes gateway/admin, scheduling (cron), memory, audits, container/system ops Hermes
In-repo code changes, features, bugfixes, PRs (in any repo the user works on) Claude Code (Hermes delegates via claude -p or interactive)
Repo docs (docs/, README, skills) Either — follow repo-conventions

Hermes orchestrates and can delegate coding to Claude Code. Claude Code works inside a repo; it does NOT manage the Hermes agent, HA gateway, or cron.

2. Plan first (MANDATORY)

Never jump straight into editing. For anything non-trivial:

  1. Restate the goal and constraints in your own words.
  2. Read the repo's AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md and .claude/skills/; explore the relevant files.
  3. Write the plan (files to touch, approach, test strategy) and get explicit user approval before mutating.
  4. If the user says "grill me" / "stress-test this" — interview them about the plan branch by branch until the design tree is resolved.

3. Confirm before mutating (MANDATORY)

  • Per-action approval for: system changes, git push, opening PRs, anything destructive.
  • A prior "yes" is not standing approval — re-confirm scope.
  • Prefer approval-free git ops: regular push, new commit, merge over rebase; no force-push without explicit approval.

4. Review

  • Run the repo's own checks before any PR: its make test/make pre-commit where defined, or the CI-equivalent.
  • Verify git identity before committing (wrong email = phantom PR participants — see repo-conventions).
  • Review your own diff before pushing; for PRs, diff against the base branch.

5. Per-repo PR flows

Load repo-conventions and follow the row for that repo. Default when unsure: branch from the default branch, conventional commit, squash-merge PR with a conventional title.

Read the full file on GitHub · 48 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 48 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A d6e2fd22ca95

Subscribe to this mod's changes

coding-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository AmineDjeghri/personal-os-setup (602 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 655 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-08.