code-review-api

code-review-api is a skill for Claude Code from andr-ca/agentharness. It costs 55 tokens per session (1,103 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A checklist for reviewing REST and HTTP API endpoints, which are web entry points that receive requests and return responses.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing route handlers and controllers for validation, authentication, pagination, versioning, idempotency, rate limits, and response formats.
Why use it?
It helps catch incorrect status codes, unsafe input handling, broken repeat-request behavior, inconsistent errors, and missing API safeguards.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths.

Good fit Reviewing route handlers and controllers for validation, authentication, pagination, versioning, idempotency, rate limits, and response formats.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/andr-ca/agentharness/code-review-api
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add andr-ca/agentharness --skill code-review-api
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andr-ca/agentharness

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-review-api

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andr-ca/agentharness/code-review-api/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/andr-ca/agentharness/code-review-api)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andr-ca/agentharness/code-review-api"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andr-ca/agentharness/code-review-api/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-review-api

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andr-ca/agentharness/code-review-api"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andr-ca/agentharness/code-review-api.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 55 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,103 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00055 $0.01103
Opus 5.5 $0.00022 $0.00441
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00221
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00110

Measured 1mo ago against content hash ca47005c5c7b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review-api scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/code-review-api/SKILL.md · 74 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Review — REST / HTTP API Layer

Focus on correctness, consistency, and safety at the HTTP boundary.


HTTP Semantics

  • Correct status codes — 201 Created for POST that creates; 200 OK for updates; 204 No Content for DELETE; 400 Bad Request for invalid input; 404 Not Found for missing resources; 409 Conflict for duplicate creation; 422 Unprocessable Entity for validation failures; 500 Internal Server Error for unhandled exceptions.
  • Non-idempotent PUT — PUT must be idempotent (same request = same result). If the operation has side effects that shouldn't repeat, it should be a POST.
  • DELETE returns a body — RFC 7231 allows it, but clients often discard it. Prefer 204 No Content unless returning the deleted resource is explicitly needed.
  • Wrong method for the operation — using GET for state-changing operations (no caching, logging of query params); using POST when PUT/PATCH is more appropriate.

Input Validation & Error Shapes

  • Missing input validation — user-supplied fields used directly without type/range/pattern validation. Every boundary input must be validated before use.
  • Inconsistent error shape — some errors return {"error": "..."}, others {"message": "..."}. The API should follow one schema (RFC 9457 Problem Details recommended).
  • Stack trace in production response — never send exception stack traces to clients. Log server-side; return a stable error code.
  • Leaking internal IDs — returning auto-increment integer IDs exposes row count; prefer UUIDs or opaque tokens.

Authentication & Authorization

  • Auth happens after the operation — authorization must be checked before the DB query, not after loading the resource.
  • Missing ownership check — user can access /orders/123 even if order 123 belongs to another user. Every resource access needs an ownership/permission check.
  • Token in URL — never put auth tokens in query strings (they appear in logs, referrer headers, browser history). Use Authorization header.
  • Missing rate limiting — unauthenticated endpoints or auth endpoints (login, signup) with no rate limit are trivially brute-forced or scraped.

Read the full file on GitHub · 74 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 74 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A ca47005c5c7b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review-api is a skill published in the GitHub repository andr-ca/agentharness (1 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 1,103 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

video-provider-capabilities

Resolve an AI-video model's live official API schema and turn it into a durable request, continuity, cost, and review plan before any paid video call. Use for Kling, Seedance, Veo, or any other video model when selecting a model, preparing or retrying a request, assigning image/video/audio references, using first or…

manishiitg/coding-agent-loop · 94 tokens

backend-review

Review backend changes for API design, correctness, resilience, observability, performance, security, and test coverage without assuming a framework.

Arnosdeus/agent-toolkit · 29 tokens

deepstream-sop

Use this skill when building, deploying, evaluating, debugging, or measuring latency for the DeepStream SOP Inference Microservice — a GPU-accelerated FastAPI service that detects whether operators perform assembly-line steps in order via event boundary detection (GEBD) plus VLM classification. Trigger even if the…

NVIDIA/skills · 219 tokens

earth2studio-create-datasource

Create and validate Earth2Studio data source wrappers (DataSource, ForecastSource, DataFrameSource, ForecastFrameSource) from remote stores. Do NOT use for fetching data with existing sources, model inference, or installation tasks.

NVIDIA/skills · 53 tokens

doca-socket-relay

Use this skill when the operator is driving the DOCA Socket Relay to bridge a socket-oriented host application onto a BlueField DPU peer without rewriting it — picking the deployment shape (in-process, sidecar, or BlueField service container), configuring the host-side socket and the DPU-side forwarding endpoint…

NVIDIA/skills · 236 tokens

flow-next-impl-review

Carmack-level implementation review of changes via the configured backend. Use when asked to review code or a diff in a flow-next repo.

gmickel/flow-next · 34 tokens