Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/andr-ca/agentharness/code-review-apinpx skills add andr-ca/agentharness --skill code-review-apigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andr-ca/agentharnessWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00055 | $0.01103 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00551 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00221 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00110 |
Grade A, and why
code-review-api scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Review — REST / HTTP API Layer
Focus on correctness, consistency, and safety at the HTTP boundary.
HTTP Semantics
- Correct status codes —
201 Createdfor POST that creates;200 OKfor updates;204 No Contentfor DELETE;400 Bad Requestfor invalid input;404 Not Foundfor missing resources;409 Conflictfor duplicate creation;422 Unprocessable Entityfor validation failures;500 Internal Server Errorfor unhandled exceptions. - Non-idempotent PUT — PUT must be idempotent (same request = same result). If the operation has side effects that shouldn't repeat, it should be a POST.
- DELETE returns a body — RFC 7231 allows it, but clients often discard it. Prefer
204 No Contentunless returning the deleted resource is explicitly needed. - Wrong method for the operation — using GET for state-changing operations (no caching, logging of query params); using POST when PUT/PATCH is more appropriate.
Input Validation & Error Shapes
- Missing input validation — user-supplied fields used directly without type/range/pattern validation. Every boundary input must be validated before use.
- Inconsistent error shape — some errors return
{"error": "..."}, others{"message": "..."}. The API should follow one schema (RFC 9457 Problem Details recommended). - Stack trace in production response — never send exception stack traces to clients. Log server-side; return a stable error code.
- Leaking internal IDs — returning auto-increment integer IDs exposes row count; prefer UUIDs or opaque tokens.
Authentication & Authorization
- Auth happens after the operation — authorization must be checked before the DB query, not after loading the resource.
- Missing ownership check — user can access
/orders/123even if order 123 belongs to another user. Every resource access needs an ownership/permission check. - Token in URL — never put auth tokens in query strings (they appear in logs, referrer headers, browser history). Use
Authorizationheader. - Missing rate limiting — unauthenticated endpoints or auth endpoints (login, signup) with no rate limit are trivially brute-forced or scraped.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 74 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A ca47005c5c7b
code-review-api is a skill published in the GitHub repository andr-ca/agentharness (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 1,103 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
html-ppt-zhangzara-coral
OpenDesign's community-growth campaign across GitHub, Discord, and X: the loops, the content calendar, and the pipeline math. Built as a decision-grade marketing & GTM deck for growth team, community lead.
hr-onboarding
A new-hire onboarding plan as a single page — first week schedule, buddy + manager intro, learning track, equipment checklist, and "you're set when…" outcomes. Use when the brief mentions "onboarding", "new hire", "first week plan", or "入职".
html-ppt-hermes-cyber-terminal
OpenDesign + BYOK: choosing and wiring your own model, hands-on — cost, quality, and the routing decision. Built as a decision-grade AI literacy deck for engineers, IT, applied-AI teams.
html-ppt-taste-brutalist
16:9 HTML deck in tactical-telemetry / CRT-terminal taste. Deactivated-CRT charcoal slides, white-phosphor monospace, hazard-red accent, scanline overlay, ASCII syntax, density over decoration. Distilled from Leonxlnx/taste-skill brutalist-skill (Tactical Telemetry mode).
deepstream-sop
Use this skill when building, deploying, evaluating, debugging, or measuring latency for the DeepStream SOP Inference Microservice — a GPU-accelerated FastAPI service that detects whether operators perform assembly-line steps in order via event boundary detection (GEBD) plus VLM classification. Trigger even if the…
cupynumeric-migration-readiness
Pre-migration readiness assessor for porting NumPy to cuPyNumeric. Use BEFORE substantial porting work begins when the user asks whether code will scale on GPU, whether they should migrate to cuPyNumeric, which NumPy patterns transfer cleanly, what must be refactored before porting, or mentions pre-port assessment…