Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/andr-ca/agentharness/testingnpx skills add andr-ca/agentharness --skill testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andr-ca/agentharnessWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00054 | $0.00885 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00443 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00177 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 104 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testing
This skill is self-contained for day-to-day use. Deeper reference (needs
the full harness checkout): patterns/testing/TDD.md (full TDD
workflow), patterns/testing/COVERAGE_REQUIREMENTS.md (80% rule and
pragma), patterns/testing/PLAYWRIGHT_UI_TESTING.md (E2E screenshots),
patterns/testing/COMPLETION_CHECKLIST.md.
Rigor tiers — apply the right standard, not the maximum
| Tier | Coverage | TDD | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Production | ≥ 80% line+branch | Required | Libraries, agents, shipped services |
| Internal | Must have tests | Recommended | No numeric floor; cover what's expensive to get wrong |
| Prototype | None required | Optional | Skip freely; document the decision |
Check .agentharness-profile or .github/CODING_GUIDELINES.md for the
project's tier before assuming 80% applies.
Red-Green-Refactor
- Red — write a failing test for the one behavior you're adding.
- Green — write the minimum code to make it pass (not the final code — the correct code comes in the next step).
- Refactor — clean up duplication and naming while tests stay green.
Never skip Red — a test that never fails doesn't prove anything.
Test one behavior per test
# WRONG: five assertions for one behavior — one failure hides the rest
def test_user_creation():
user = User.create(email="[email protected]", password="s3cr3t")
assert user.id is not None
assert user.email == "[email protected]"
assert user.password_hash is not None
assert user.created_at is not None
assert user.is_active is True
# RIGHT: one assertion covers "all fields are set" as a single behavior
def test_user_creation_populates_all_fields():
user = User.create(email="[email protected]", password="s3cr3t")
assert user == {
"id": AnyString(),
"email": "[email protected]",
"password_hash": AnyString(),
"created_at": AnyDatetime(),
"is_active": True,
}
Split into multiple tests only when the behaviors can independently fail for unrelated reasons.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 104 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 230d5b5995ce
testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository andr-ca/agentharness (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 885 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
html-ppt-zhangzara-coral
OpenDesign's community-growth campaign across GitHub, Discord, and X: the loops, the content calendar, and the pipeline math. Built as a decision-grade marketing & GTM deck for growth team, community lead.
hr-onboarding
A new-hire onboarding plan as a single page — first week schedule, buddy + manager intro, learning track, equipment checklist, and "you're set when…" outcomes. Use when the brief mentions "onboarding", "new hire", "first week plan", or "入职".
html-ppt-hermes-cyber-terminal
OpenDesign + BYOK: choosing and wiring your own model, hands-on — cost, quality, and the routing decision. Built as a decision-grade AI literacy deck for engineers, IT, applied-AI teams.
html-ppt-taste-brutalist
16:9 HTML deck in tactical-telemetry / CRT-terminal taste. Deactivated-CRT charcoal slides, white-phosphor monospace, hazard-red accent, scanline overlay, ASCII syntax, density over decoration. Distilled from Leonxlnx/taste-skill brutalist-skill (Tactical Telemetry mode).
deepstream-sop
Use this skill when building, deploying, evaluating, debugging, or measuring latency for the DeepStream SOP Inference Microservice — a GPU-accelerated FastAPI service that detects whether operators perform assembly-line steps in order via event boundary detection (GEBD) plus VLM classification. Trigger even if the…
cupynumeric-migration-readiness
Pre-migration readiness assessor for porting NumPy to cuPyNumeric. Use BEFORE substantial porting work begins when the user asks whether code will scale on GPU, whether they should migrate to cuPyNumeric, which NumPy patterns transfer cleanly, what must be refactored before porting, or mentions pre-port assessment…