Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add andregusman-raiz/a-gusman-claude --skill ag-avaliar-arquiteturagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andregusman-raiz/a-gusman-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/andregusman-raiz/a-gusman-claude/ag-avaliar-arquitetura)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andregusman-raiz/a-gusman-claude/ag-avaliar-arquitetura"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andregusman-raiz/a-gusman-claude/ag-avaliar-arquitetura/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andregusman-raiz/a-gusman-claude/ag-avaliar-arquitetura"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andregusman-raiz/a-gusman-claude/ag-avaliar-arquitetura.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 4 Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.01082 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00433 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00216 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
ag-avaliar-arquitetura scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ARCHITECT — Saude Arquitetural
Reasoning protocol (tier topo — Fable, equivalente a
reasoning_effort=xhigh): Audit arquitetural raso = falso confort. Para cada dimensao (STRUCTURE/COUPLING/DEBT/PATTERNS/SCALE): Exhaust riscos plausiveis; Verify com Read de pelo menos 5 arquivos relevantes por dimensao; Falsify (esta dimensao realmente tem o problema que aparenta?); Connect achados a impacto operacional concreto; Report com paths/linhas exatos para cada finding. Findings sem path:linha = nao contam. Detalhes:.claude/rules/deep-reasoning-directive.md.
/architect ~/Claude/GitHub/raiz-platform
/architect ~/Claude/GitHub/salarios-platform --threshold 90
5 dimensoes: STRUCTURE (camadas), COUPLING (dependencias), DEBT (tech debt), PATTERNS (consistencia), SCALE (performance). So modo local. Produz Architecture Certificate + Tech Debt Register + Fix PR.
Dimensao PATTERNS — Checklist obrigatorio de Separation of Concerns
Para projetos React/Next/TS, a dimensao PATTERNS DEVE executar este checklist concreto (nao abstrato):
1. Fetch / mutation em componentes apresentacionais
# Componentes em pastas "burras" nunca devem chamar API direto
grep -rEn 'fetch\(|axios\.|supabase\.|prisma\.' \
src/components/ui/ src/components/atoms/ src/components/presentational/ \
2>/dev/null | grep -v ".test." | grep -v ".stories."
Resultado > 0 → finding HIGH (severidade ALTO).
2. Regra de negocio em UI components
# Calculos, validacoes, business rules dentro de componentes JSX
# Heuristica: funcoes nao-trivial dentro de .tsx (> 10 linhas, > 2 branches)
# Combinada com: file path em /components/ui ou /presentational
# AST custom: countFunctionsInFile + filterByComplexity
Cada match e candidato a extracao para hook (useX) ou service (services/X.ts).
3. Props drilling > 3 niveis (candidato a container)
# Buscar componentes que passam props sem usa-los (pass-through)
# AST: para cada componente, contar props recebidos vs usados localmente
# Se > 50% dos props sao apenas re-passados → candidato a container
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 86 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 6a0f42d02e74
ag-avaliar-arquitetura is a skill published in the GitHub repository andregusman-raiz/a-gusman-claude (18 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 1,082 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
sync-bridge
Reviews and guides Chromium Sync Model API (DataTypeSyncBridge) implementations, including DataTypeStore persistence and forwards/backwards compatibility for sync specifics. Use when implementing or reviewing a DataTypeSyncBridge subclass, DataTypeStore usage, sync metadata persistence, conflict resolution, or…
sync-model-processor
Reviews changes to Chromium Sync model internals in components/sync/model/, including ClientTagBasedDataTypeProcessor, ClientTagBasedRemoteUpdateHandler, ProcessorEntity, ProcessorEntityMetadata, and ProcessorEntityTracker. Use when modifying or reviewing processor state transitions, entity metadata tracking, conflict…
adversarial-reviewer
Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…
gsd-ns-review
Invoke this Pi skill with /skill:gsd-ns-review.
gitnexus
A code-graph analysis add-on for examining an existing codebase, including symbols, call paths, execution flows, and effects across repositories. It can query GitNexus through its command-line or MCP interfaces.
issue
Use when starting a chain from a GitHub issue — turning an issue URL or number into a triaged, planned, dispatched, and reviewed pull request. Classifies the thread (bug → root-cause discipline, feature → plan chain, question → drafted reply), synthesizes a spec from the issue's own acceptance criteria, then runs the…