Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add andregusman-raiz/a-gusman-claude --skill ag-testar-ux-qualidadegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andregusman-raiz/a-gusman-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/andregusman-raiz/a-gusman-claude/ag-testar-ux-qualidade)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andregusman-raiz/a-gusman-claude/ag-testar-ux-qualidade"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andregusman-raiz/a-gusman-claude/ag-testar-ux-qualidade/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andregusman-raiz/a-gusman-claude/ag-testar-ux-qualidade"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andregusman-raiz/a-gusman-claude/ag-testar-ux-qualidade.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 4 Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.01143 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00457 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00229 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
ag-testar-ux-qualidade scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ag-testar-ux-qualidade — UX-QAT Visual Quality Testing
Papel
O PDCA Orchestrator de qualidade visual: executa ciclo completo Plan-Do-Check-Act de UX-QAT. Avalia telas em 4 camadas (L1 Renderizacao → L2 Interacao → L3 Percepcao Visual → L4 Compliance) com AI Judge multimodal.
Diferenca de ag-testar-qualidade-qat: ag-testar-qualidade-qat avalia CONTEUDO. ag-testar-ux-qualidade avalia VISUAL/UX. Diferenca de ag-testar-e2e: ag-testar-e2e testa FLUXOS. ag-testar-ux-qualidade testa QUALIDADE VISUAL. Diferenca de ag-revisar-ux: ag-revisar-ux review pontual. ag-testar-ux-qualidade avaliacao CONTINUA com PDCA.
Captura de apps nativos (non-browser)
Para avaliar UX de apps desktop/nativos (nao-browser), usar ag-capturar-tela:
Agent({ subagent_type: "ag-capturar-tela", prompt: "Capture a tela do app nativo para avaliacao UX-QAT" })
Invocacao
/ag-testar-ux-qualidade https://app.vercel.app # Todas as telas, threshold 6
/ag-testar-ux-qualidade https://app.vercel.app dashboard # Tela especifica
/ag-testar-ux-qualidade https://app.vercel.app all --layers=L1,L2,L4 # Sem L3 (economia)
/ag-testar-ux-qualidade https://app.vercel.app all 7 # Threshold customizado
Pre-requisitos
- Estrutura
tests/ux-qat/no projeto (copiar de~/.claude/shared/templates/ux-qat/) tests/ux-qat/design-tokens.jsonconfiguradoplaywright-cliinstalado- URL da app acessivel
- Para L3:
ANTHROPIC_API_KEYconfigurado
Ciclo PDCA
PLAN: Preflight + carregar KB (baselines, failure-patterns, design tokens)
DO: Capturar screenshots por breakpoint × tema
Executar 4 camadas (L1 Render → L2 Interaction → L3 Perception → L4 Compliance)
Short-circuit: se L1 falha, skip L2-L4 (~30% economia)
CHECK: Classificar falhas (RENDER/INTERACTION/PERCEPTION/COMPLIANCE/RUBRIC/FLAKY)
Comparar com baselines, detectar regressoes visuais
ACT: Atualizar baselines, registrar failure patterns, adicionar learnings
Gerar report PDCA com acoes tomadas
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 85 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A fe207b656e7d
ag-testar-ux-qualidade is a skill published in the GitHub repository andregusman-raiz/a-gusman-claude (18 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 1,143 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
qa-test-planner
Generate comprehensive test plans, manual test cases, regression test suites, and bug reports for QA engineers. Includes Figma MCP integration for design validation.
design-qa
Internal prototype QA helper. Use only after a Product Design prototype, URL-to-code build, or image-to-code build has a source visual target and a rendered implementation to compare before handoff. Do not use for broad UX critique, design critique, product audits, or flow reviews; route those user-facing requests to…
health
Audits agent config, instruction drift, hooks or MCP, and AI maintainability. Use when Claude, Codex, or Pi setup looks wrong. Not for application bugs or PR review.
hunt
Finds root cause before any fix. Use when something errors, crashes, regresses, or used to work. Not for code review or new features.
ui-craft-checks
Use this comprehensive gate for formal review, QA, launch handoff, exact-fidelity inspection, high-risk complex UI, or when the fast gate exposes a deeper craft problem. Ordinary single-screen work uses ui-design-executor and its bundled validator without loading this full matrix. Pair standalone artifacts with…
critique
Adversarial design critique of the current work. Render it, look at it, and argue for rejection. Run after the gates are green, never instead of them.