Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to andrianllmm/renux. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/andrianllmm/renux/main/.agents/skills/pre-flight/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andrianllmm/renuxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/andrianllmm/renux/pre-flight)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andrianllmm/renux/pre-flight"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andrianllmm/renux/pre-flight.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 42 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00303 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00151 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00061 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
pre-flight scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
pre-flight
Runs the same checks CI and the pre-commit hooks enforce, so problems are caught before a commit attempt fails partway through.
Steps
Run in order, fixing failures as you go:
- Tests
poetry run pytest - Type check
poetry run mypy src - Format and lint
poetry run black . poetry run isort . - README sync. Required if
src/renux/tags.pyorsrc/renux/tags_reference.pychanged:
If it prints "README.md tags reference updated.", re-stage README.md.poetry run python scripts/sync_readme.py - Re-check
git status/git difffor anything the above steps modified (formatting, README) before committing.
Notes
- Commit messages must follow Conventional Commits (enforced by the
commitizen
commit-msghook). Usepoetry run cz commitfor a guided prompt if unsure. - Don't bypass any of this with
git commit --no-verify.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 43 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 51d41de5340c
pre-flight is a skill published in the GitHub repository andrianllmm/renux (69 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 303 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
compiler-commit
Use when you want to verify compiler changes and commit with the correct convention. Runs tests, lint, and format, then commits with the [compiler] or [rust-compiler] prefix.
mem0-test-integration
Verify a Mem0 integration produced by /mem0-integrate. Runs in the same workspace on the same branch (loose coupling) — installs dependencies, runs the repo's native test suite, then exercises a real end-to-end smoke flow against the user's API key. Produces a scorecard. TRIGGER when: user has just run /mem0-integrate…
mem0-integrate
Integrate Mem0 into an existing repository using a goal-driven, TDD pipeline. Detects the repo's language automatically and asks the user to pick between Mem0 Platform (managed) and Mem0 Open Source (self-hosted). Writes failing tests before any implementation. Produces a local feature branch plus .mem0-integration/…
code-review
Perform a structured code review of changes, checking for correctness, style, tests, and potential issues.
cli-command
Design, implement, or review Composio CLI commands under ts/packages/cli using Effect, @effect/cli, services, output conventions, configuration and environment variables, and local vendor references. Use for CLI command UX, command wiring, service changes, or CLI source edits. Do not use for CLI E2E-only work; use…
review
Structured PR review for pygraphistry. Input: PR number/branch (default current branch PR). Output: findings and convergence artifacts under plans/ /. Method: multi-wave, evidence-first review across spec, correctness, tests, security, code quality, DRY, concurrency, performance, architecture, operability, and…