Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/andyduck-ops/omp-flow/omp-flow-checknpx skills add Andyduck-ops/omp-flow --skill omp-flow-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Andyduck-ops/omp-flowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/andyduck-ops/omp-flow/omp-flow-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andyduck-ops/omp-flow/omp-flow-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andyduck-ops/omp-flow/omp-flow-check.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00029 | $0.01012 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00506 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00202 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00101 |
Grade A, and why
omp-flow-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 83 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
OMP-Flow Check
Required Inputs
Fail closed unless all are available:
- task Bundle root, review role, bounded objective, and work entry Concept;
- explicit Review Concept output path;
- native reviewer actor ID and review dispatch receipt;
- completed implementation predecessor receipt from a different actor;
- work Concept and predecessor-linked handoff, plus any applicable linked design or decisions;
- real implementation diff;
Review Order
Only Main/coordinator may dispatch, correlate operations/receipts, obtain or record human calibration, and choose a workflow transition. Those coordinator actions are inapplicable to an already-dispatched Reviewer: it must not dispatch or self-redispatch, govern, calibrate, transition, or selectively reinterpret coordinator clauses. The Reviewer still owns the complete bounded independent Review and assigned Review Concept: compare actual code and verification with the intended work/Design consequence, and report evidence contradicting the Design or its principal-problem framing through that output rather than let a handoff or superficial green check substitute for the practice result.
- Resolve the completed predecessor operation and use its output path as the required handoff. Read the work Concept and handoff, verify they identify each other, then inspect the real diff and changed files.
- Check scope and acceptance criteria against the work Concept and approved design.
- Inspect correctness, edge cases, error behavior, security, maintainability, and test adequacy proportional to risk.
- Verify applicable linked decisions, interfaces, and source constraints.
- Run independent focused tests and broaden checks for shared behavior or contracts.
- Write the Review Concept at the supplied output path, link it to the work and handoff, lead
with severity-ordered findings, give every finding all applicable
HARD_BLOCKER,PRINCIPAL_BLOCKER,WORK_FAIL, andADVISORYlabels, and record exact commands/results.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 83 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 7d7701107f26
omp-flow-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository Andyduck-ops/omp-flow (5 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,012 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…