Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AndyZhuang/Opentest --skill patent-draftinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AndyZhuang/OpentestWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/andyzhuang/opentest/patent-drafting)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andyzhuang/opentest/patent-drafting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andyzhuang/opentest/patent-drafting/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andyzhuang/opentest/patent-drafting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andyzhuang/opentest/patent-drafting.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00356 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00178 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00071 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
patent-drafting scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to patent-drafting — 5 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Patent Drafting — Intellectual Property Protection for Research
Overview
Draft patent applications for scientific inventions, covering claims, specification, and prior art analysis.
Patent Application Structure
1. Title
- Descriptive but not limiting
- Include key technical terms
2. Abstract (150 words max)
- Technical problem, solution, key advantage
- Independent claim in prose form
3. Background / Field of Invention
- Technical field
- Prior art and its limitations
- Problem to be solved
4. Summary of Invention
- Brief description matching broadest claims
- Key advantages over prior art
5. Detailed Description
- Best mode of carrying out the invention
- Enable a person skilled in the art to reproduce
- Include examples and experimental data
- Reference all figures
6. Claims
- Independent claims: broadest protection
- Dependent claims: specific embodiments
- Method claims, composition claims, use claims
- Means-plus-function for apparatus
7. Drawings / Figures
- Flow diagrams, structural formulas, experimental results
- Reference numerals consistent with description
Prior Art Search Strategy
- Patent databases: Google Patents, USPTO, WIPO, EPO, CNIPA
- Scientific literature: PubMed, Google Scholar
- Conference proceedings and theses
- Product catalogs and technical documents
Key Principles
- Enablement: Specification must enable reproduction
- Novelty: At least one element not in prior art
- Non-obviousness: Combination/modification not obvious to skilled person
- Written description: Inventor possessed the invention at filing date
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 52 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 14987b320b57
patent-drafting is a skill published in the GitHub repository AndyZhuang/Opentest (22 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 356 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to patent-drafting, differing in 5 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
analytical-method-validation
Plan, execute, and document validation, verification, and transfer of analytical procedures under the governing framework - ICH Q2(R2) and Q14, USP / / , ICH M10 bioanalytical, CLSI EP, or ISO/IEC 17025. Use for HPLC, LC-MS/MS, GC, CE, ICP-MS, dissolution, qNMR, qPCR, NIR, and ligand binding or cell-based assays…
nature-paper-to-patent
Convert scientific papers, theses, technical reports, source code, figures, inventor notes, or research manuscripts into evidence-grounded Chinese invention patent drafts and attorney-facing technical disclosure materials. Use when an AI agent must mine patent points, draft or revise a Chinese technical disclosure…
auditing-part11-trails
Generates and verifies 21 CFR Part 11-style audit trails — who/what/when, electronic signatures, and tamper-evidence — for OpenMed pipelines in GxP and clinical-trial (GCP) settings. Use when the user runs OpenMed in a regulated/validated environment and needs an attributable, time-stamped, tamper-evident record of…
generating-synthetic-surrogates
Replace detected PHI with realistic, type-matched fake values in OpenMed so clinical notes stay readable and parseable instead of full of [REDACTED] markers. Use when the user wants surrogate names, MRNs, addresses, or dates rather than opaque masks, needs consistent fake identities across a document, must keep notes…
shifting-clinical-dates
Apply consistent per-patient date shifting in OpenMed that preserves intervals between events while satisfying HIPAA Safe Harbor's date rule. Use when the user needs to de-identify dates but keep temporal structure for research, shift all dates by the same offset per patient, preserve days-between-events for survival…
fda-database
Query openFDA API for drugs, devices, adverse events, recalls, regulatory submissions (510k, PMA), substance identification (UNII), for FDA regulatory data analysis and safety research.