Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to angadhn/botference. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/angadhn/botference/main/.agents/skills/paper-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/angadhn/botferenceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/angadhn/botference/paper-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/angadhn/botference/paper-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/angadhn/botference/paper-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/angadhn/botference/paper-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/angadhn/botference/paper-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Agent Snooping · line 44 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 45 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.02775 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.01110 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00555 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00278 |
Grade A, and why
paper-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 193 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
paper-review — GDocs-style review of rendered sources, with bots
The engine is built and battle-tested. Canonical engine:
$BOTFERENCE_HOME/frontends/review/ (ships with botference). Architecture, decision history, and the unbuilt roadmap (CI
rounds, cloud version): design.md next to this file. This file tells
you how to USE the system.
Setting up a new project ("set up paper review in ")
Preferred: botference review [dir] — one command does all of the
below (engine copy, detection via scripts/review-detect.mjs with an
echoed summary, gitignore, build, serve; --share, --hosted,
--port N, --no-agents, --upgrade). Use the manual steps only when
the launcher isn't available:
- Copy the engine from the reference implementation into
<dir>/review/:build.mjs,server.mjs,chat.mjs,apply.mjs,submit.mjs,init-config.mjs,bridge-system-prompt.md,SCHEMA.md,assets/(review.js, style.css). Never copyreview.config.json,state/,suggestions.json, orsite/— those are per-project. - Run
node review/init-config.mjsfrom<dir>(it inspects the directory: master file via\documentclass, sections via\input/\includeorder, bib, abbreviations, todo macros, figures dir, a free port, and the bridge block). Show the user what was detected and get their confirmation before proceeding — never guess the master file silently. - Add the gitignore block (see reference repo):
review/site/andreview/state/*ignored EXCEPTstate/users/andstate/threads.json;suggestions.jsontracked. Conversation must travel through the repo; runtime files must not. node review/build.mjs, then commitreview/("Add review interface"). Requirespandocon PATH — check and tell the user if missing.
Running it
Sync note: the workspace copies of this skill at
<vault>/botference/.claude/skills/paper-review/SKILL.mdand<vault>/botference/.agents/skills/paper-review/SKILL.mdare plain copies of this file — when you edit it (either copy in botference-main or those), update all four.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 193 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 3dee52468738
paper-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository angadhn/botference (20 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 2,775 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
dcf-model
Build discounted cash flow valuation workbooks in Excel.
comps-analysis
Build comparable-company valuation workbooks in Excel.
siyuan
Query and edit a SiYuan knowledge base via its API.
xlsx
Create, read, edit Excel .xlsx workbooks and CSVs.
pptx-author
Build PowerPoint decks headless with python-pptx.
box
Box manages cloud files, sharing, search, and metadata.