see-ui

see-ui — look at the page before you say it's done

Layout and design failures are invisible to your normal loop: the DOM is valid, the CSS applied, the console silent — and the page is still broken to a human eye (a chart squashed into 5% of its width renders "successfully"). Code and logs cannot catch "technically correct but looks wrong". Pixels can, and you can read pixels.

The command

botference see <target> [label] [--viewport WxH]... [--basic-auth U:P] [--out DIR]

• <target>: a URL, a bare :port (localhost), a local file path (HTML, SVG — rendered via file://, no server needed: the way to verify charts, reports, and mockups you just wrote), or the NAME of a running botference service — its listening port is discovered from the live process, you never need to know it.
• Never hand-roll rendering via ImageMagick/qlmanage/rsvg to check a chart — their SVG engines have artifacts Chrome does not; see is the trustworthy lane and works from your sandbox.
• Default viewports: 390x844 (phone — real mobile layout, since responsive CSS answers to viewport width) and 1440x900 (desktop).
• It prints wrote: <path>.png lines. Read those images. That is the entire point — do not run the command and skip looking.
• Output defaults to .botference/shots/ (gitignored by convention).

Protocol

1. After ANY change that affects rendered UI, screenshot both default viewports and look at them before reporting the change as done.
2. When a human reports something "looks wrong/bad/off", screenshot FIRST, at the viewport they used (phone screenshots → 390x844), and compare with what they see. Do not reason about CSS from source alone.
3. If the app has a login form, your screenshot will show only the gate. Fix that properly: let bare-localhost requests through unauthenticated (the review engine's rule — anyone on the loopback port already owns the machine). --basic-auth helps only for HTTP basic auth, not form gates.
4. Charts and figures: vision discovers a failure class once — then lock it out forever with a deterministic test on the generated SVG/scales, no browser needed. Assert data coverage (observed data spans ≥ ~half the x-range; projections must not compress history), containment (points inside the plot area, y-domain spans the data, no NaN coordinates), and legibility (labels don't collide, sane tick counts, markers above minimum visible size). Every visual chart fix ships with the invariant test that would have failed on the bad render.