Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add anhnguyen0905/codex-mcp --skill data-quality-checksgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anhnguyen0905/codex-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/anhnguyen0905/codex-mcp/data-quality-checks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anhnguyen0905/codex-mcp/data-quality-checks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anhnguyen0905/codex-mcp/data-quality-checks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anhnguyen0905/codex-mcp/data-quality-checks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anhnguyen0905/codex-mcp/data-quality-checks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00105 | $0.01600 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00053 | $0.00800 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00320 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00160 |
Grade A, and why
data-quality-checks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 123 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Data Quality Checks (assertions, reconciliation, honest reporting)
The seven check families, as assertions
Every useful check is a predicate plus a threshold, evaluable automatically against a table:
Completeness assert count(*) where required_col is null = 0
assert count(distinct load_date) over window = expected_days (partitions present)
Uniqueness assert count(*) = count(distinct <business_key>) (the declared grain)
Validity/range assert age between 0 and 120; status in (...); amount >= 0; format/length rules
Consistency assert abs(sum(a.rev) - sum(b.rev)) / sum(b.rev) <= tol (source vs source)
Referential assert count(child left join parent where parent.id is null) = 0 (no orphans)
Timeliness assert max(event_ts) >= now() - <SLA interval> (freshness)
Drift assert abs(mean_today - mean_baseline) <= k * stddev_baseline
assert null_rate_today <= null_rate_baseline * (1 + tol)
Each assertion needs a grain, a severity (warn vs fail) and an owner. An unowned failing check gets muted, which is worse than having no check at all.
Reconciliation, source to destination
Row counts alone prove nothing — dedup, filtering and late arrivals legitimately change them. Reconcile counts and sums per partition, every term measured rather than assumed:
source_rows - filtered_rows - deduped_rows = destination_rows
sum(source.amount) over the window = sum(dest.amount) ± rounding tolerance
per-key spot check: sample N business keys, compare field by field
Reconcile a closed window, never the currently-loading partition, and state the tolerance with its cause (float rounding, FX conversion, timezone edge) instead of picking whatever makes it pass.
Grain and duplicate keys
Use the business key that defines the grain, not the surrogate key — surrogates are unique by
construction and prove nothing. Typical real keys: (event_id), (user_id, event_ts, event_type),
(order_id, line_no). Test near-duplicates too: same natural key with different surrogate ids (double
ingestion), same payload at different timestamps (retry storms). Document the resolution rule — keep
first, keep last by ingestion time, keep highest version — because distinct picks one silently.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 123 lines · 105 tokens per session scan A 9b43bb6c4857
data-quality-checks is a skill published in the GitHub repository anhnguyen0905/codex-mcp (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 105 tokens to every session and 1,600 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.