Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add anortham/julie-plugin --skill impact-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anortham/julie-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/anortham/julie-plugin/impact-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anortham/julie-plugin/impact-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anortham/julie-plugin/impact-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anortham/julie-plugin/impact-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anortham/julie-plugin/impact-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.01431 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00572 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00286 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00143 |
Grade A, and why
impact-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to impact-analysis — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 130 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Impact Analysis
Analyze the impact of changing a symbol by finding all references and assessing risk. Use this BEFORE modifying widely-used symbols.
Process
Step 1: Resolve the change target
If the user gives you a symbol name, resolve the definition first so you know which file or symbol they mean:
fast_search(query="<symbol_name>", workspace="<workspace_id>")
deep_dive(symbol="<symbol_name>", context_file="<partial_file_path>", depth="overview", workspace="<workspace_id>")
Use context_file when the name is ambiguous. If the target is described conceptually rather than named exactly, try fast_search(query="<concept>", backend="semantic", workspace="<workspace_id>") or backend="hybrid" to find candidate symbols. Semantic/hybrid fast_search results are symbol-only; use explicit lexical for file paths and pure lexical comparison. Default fast_search may show labeled semantic fallback candidates only after an identifier-like unscoped lexical zero-hit. blast_radius(symbol_ids=[...], workspace="<workspace_id>") is the tightest seed mode, but only use it when another Julie result already gave you concrete symbol IDs. If all you have is a definition file, use file_paths=[...].
Step 2: One-shot impact via blast_radius
blast_radius(file_paths=["<definition_file>"], max_depth=2, include_tests=true, workspace="<workspace_id>")
blast_radius is the primary entry point for impact analysis. One call returns ranked impacted symbols with why-reasons and likely tests. It walks the reference graph deterministically, so you don't have to chain get_context → fast_refs → deep_dive to build the same picture.
You can seed it three ways:
file_paths=["src/foo.rs"]— default when you know the changed file but not a symbol IDsymbol_ids=["<id>"]— tighter impact when another Julie result already gave you concrete symbol IDs
If the impact list is large, the output ends with Output truncated at <N> results; narrow the query or pass a smaller limit. See Step 4.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -17 lines 4b1f043d6295
- 2mo ago First seen · 147 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A d5aa5cd159dc
impact-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository anortham/julie-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,431 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to impact-analysis, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when debugging a failing test, build error, or runtime issue that isn't immediately obvious. Guides a 4-phase root cause analysis instead of random fix attempts.
log-error-digest
Analyze log files to troubleshoot errors, identify peak error periods, and produce error clustering, frequency statistics, and time distribution reports. Supports JSON, syslog, and Nginx formats with automatic detection. Use when a user uploads a .log file and asks to analyze errors, find patterns, debug issues, or…
cwv-optimizer
Diagnose and fix Core Web Vitals issues on AEM Edge Delivery Services pages. Goes deeper than generic CWV advice by understanding EDS-specific performance patterns including the 100KB LCP budget, E-L-D loading phases, block rendering behavior, and third-party script impact. Produces specific fixes for LCP, CLS, and…
incident-response-incident-response
Coordinate production incident triage, mitigation, investigation, recovery, and follow-up. Use when responding to outages or other incidents that require structured operational coordination.
ci-fixer
CI failures - read error, minimal fix, verify.
diagnosing-missing-recordings
Diagnoses why a session recording is missing or was not captured. Use when a user asks why a session has no replay, why recordings aren't appearing, or wants to troubleshoot session replay capture issues for a specific session ID or across their project. Covers SDK diagnostic signals, project settings, sampling…