julie: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/impact-analysis/SKILL.md

impact-analysis is a skill for Claude Code from anortham/julie. It costs 44 tokens per session (1,431 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide for tracing where a piece of code is used and judging the risk of changing it. A symbol means a named item such as a function, class, or variable.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to find callers and references, group affected areas by risk, and estimate the impact of changing a function, class, variable, or file.
Why use it?
It helps reveal which parts of a project could break during a refactor before code is changed.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

This is anortham/julie's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on julie itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything julie configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to anortham/julie. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/anortham/julie/main/.claude/skills/impact-analysis/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anortham/julie

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for impact-analysis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anortham/julie/impact-analysis/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/anortham/julie/impact-analysis)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anortham/julie/impact-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anortham/julie/impact-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for impact-analysis

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anortham/julie/impact-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anortham/julie/impact-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 44 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,431 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00044 $0.01431
Opus 5.5 $0.00018 $0.00572
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00286
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00143

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 4b1f043d6295, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

impact-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

.claude/skills/impact-analysis/SKILL.md · 130 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 130 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Impact Analysis

Analyze the impact of changing a symbol by finding all references and assessing risk. Use this BEFORE modifying widely-used symbols.

Process

Step 1: Resolve the change target

If the user gives you a symbol name, resolve the definition first so you know which file or symbol they mean:

fast_search(query="<symbol_name>", workspace="<workspace_id>")
deep_dive(symbol="<symbol_name>", context_file="<partial_file_path>", depth="overview", workspace="<workspace_id>")

Use context_file when the name is ambiguous. If the target is described conceptually rather than named exactly, try fast_search(query="<concept>", backend="semantic", workspace="<workspace_id>") or backend="hybrid" to find candidate symbols. Semantic/hybrid fast_search results are symbol-only; use explicit lexical for file paths and pure lexical comparison. Default fast_search may show labeled semantic fallback candidates only after an identifier-like unscoped lexical zero-hit. blast_radius(symbol_ids=[...], workspace="<workspace_id>") is the tightest seed mode, but only use it when another Julie result already gave you concrete symbol IDs. If all you have is a definition file, use file_paths=[...].

Step 2: One-shot impact via blast_radius

blast_radius(file_paths=["<definition_file>"], max_depth=2, include_tests=true, workspace="<workspace_id>")

blast_radius is the primary entry point for impact analysis. One call returns ranked impacted symbols with why-reasons and likely tests. It walks the reference graph deterministically, so you don't have to chain get_context → fast_refs → deep_dive to build the same picture.

You can seed it three ways:

  • file_paths=["src/foo.rs"] — default when you know the changed file but not a symbol ID
  • symbol_ids=["<id>"] — tighter impact when another Julie result already gave you concrete symbol IDs

If the impact list is large, the output ends with Output truncated at <N> results; narrow the query or pass a smaller limit. See Step 4.

Read the full file on GitHub · 130 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed · -17 lines 4b1f043d6295
  2. 2mo ago First seen · 147 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A d5aa5cd159dc

Subscribe to this mod's changes

impact-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository anortham/julie (6 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,431 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens