Knowledge Work Plugins is an open-source collection of Claude extensions organized around roles such as productivity, sales, and customer support. Each plugin combines role-specific guidance, connectors, commands, and sub-agents so knowledge workers can use Claude with their team’s tools and processes. The catalogue entries are examples of, or workflows from, this plugin collection.
Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-pluginsnpx agentmods add skills/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/capacity-planWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/capacity-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/capacity-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/capacity-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/capacity-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/capacity-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.00835 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00334 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00167 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
capacity-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- capacity-plan — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- capacity-plan — 98% identical, 10 lines differ
- capacity-plan — 91% identical, 8 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 114 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/capacity-plan
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Analyze team capacity and plan resource allocation.
Usage
/capacity-plan $ARGUMENTS
What I Need From You
- Team size and roles: Who do you have?
- Current workload: What are they working on? (Upload from project tracker or describe)
- Upcoming work: What's coming next quarter?
- Constraints: Budget, hiring timeline, skill requirements
Planning Dimensions
People
- Available headcount and skills
- Current allocation and utilization
- Planned hires and timeline
- Contractor and vendor capacity
Budget
- Operating budget by category
- Project-specific budgets
- Variance tracking
- Forecast vs. actual
Time
- Project timelines and dependencies
- Critical path analysis
- Buffer and contingency planning
- Deadline management
Utilization Targets
| Role Type | Target Utilization | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| IC / Specialist | 75-80% | Leave room for reactive work and growth |
| Manager | 60-70% | Management overhead, meetings, 1:1s |
| On-call / Support | 50-60% | Interrupt-driven work is unpredictable |
Common Pitfalls
- Planning to 100% utilization (no buffer for surprises)
- Ignoring meeting load and context-switching costs
- Not accounting for vacation, holidays, and sick time
- Treating all hours as equal (creative work ≠ admin work)
Output
## Capacity Plan: [Team/Project]
**Period:** [Date range] | **Team Size:** [X]
### Current Utilization
| Person/Role | Capacity | Allocated | Available | Utilization |
|-------------|----------|-----------|-----------|-------------|
| [Name/Role] | [hrs/wk] | [hrs/wk] | [hrs/wk] | [X]% |
### Capacity Summary
- **Total capacity**: [X] hours/week
- **Currently allocated**: [X] hours/week ([X]%)
- **Available**: [X] hours/week ([X]%)
- **Overallocated**: [X people above 100%]
### Upcoming Demand
| Project/Initiative | Start | End | Resources Needed | Gap |
|--------------------|-------|-----|-----------------|-----|
| [Project] | [Date] | [Date] | [X FTEs] | [Covered/Gap] |
### Bottlenecks
- [Skill or role that's oversubscribed]
- [Time period with a crunch]
### Recommendations
1. [Hire / Contract / Reprioritize / Delay]
2. [Specific action]
### Scenarios
| Scenario | Outcome |
|----------|---------|
| Do nothing | [What happens] |
| Hire [X] | [What changes] |
| Deprioritize [Y] | [What frees up] |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 114 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 3b8f1379471e
capacity-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins (30,501 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 835 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
story-readiness
Checks whether a story is ready to implement: clear acceptance criteria, no open questions, valid ADR and dependencies. Use when the user asks if a story, or the sprint's stories, are ready to start or build.
recipe-create-meet-space
Create a Google Meet meeting space and share the join link.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
projects
List all managed projects with status, branch, open PRs, and open issue counts — portfolio-level view.
handle-linkedin-connection-request-signal
Use this skill when someone sends a team member an inbound LinkedIn connection request. An inbound request is a deliberate, ACTIVE first-party intent signal — meaningfully stronger than a passive profile view — and it deserves different scoring rules. The skill resolves and enriches the requester, gates them through…