Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add antibrow/anti-detect-browser-skills --skill multi-account-isolationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/antibrow/anti-detect-browser-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/antibrow/anti-detect-browser-skills/multi-account-isolation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/antibrow/anti-detect-browser-skills/multi-account-isolation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/antibrow/anti-detect-browser-skills/multi-account-isolation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/antibrow/anti-detect-browser-skills/multi-account-isolation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/antibrow/anti-detect-browser-skills/multi-account-isolation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket warn
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 85 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00220 | $0.02587 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00110 | $0.01293 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00517 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00259 |
Grade A, and why
multi-account-isolation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Profile Isolation - verifying it, not assuming it
A profile that looks isolated usually is not. The failures are boring and mechanical: a timezone that does not match the exit IP, a WebRTC candidate carrying the real address, a canvas hash that changes on every read, two profiles that ended up on the same persona. This skill is the check list for catching those before they matter.
Authorized use only. This is for identities you own or are authorized to operate: your own accounts, your own test fixtures, your own QA fleet, and your own anti-fraud stack. It is not for accessing systems without authorization, for accounts that are not yours, or for creating fake accounts or engagement. Comply with the terms of the sites you automate and with applicable law - see Acceptable use.
What this does not claim. Passing every check below means the browser layer is internally consistent. It does not mean a given site will treat two profiles as unrelated: things entirely outside the browser - a shared payment instrument, a shared contact detail, identical activity patterns - are not something any browser setting reaches. Treat a clean result as "the technical layer is not the problem", not as a guarantee.
For the SDK that creates and launches these profiles, see the anti-detect-browser skill.
The configuration invariant
One identity gets one of everything. Any cell shared between two identities is a defect to find:
identity → profile → persona → proxy → timezone
1 : 1 : 1 : 1 : 1
Profiles are unlimited and free on every antibrow plan, so there is never a reason to reuse one. "Log out and log back in as the other identity" inside one profile defeats the entire setup - the cookie jar and localStorage are the point.
Setup under test
import { AntiDetectBrowser } from 'anti-detect-browser'
const ab = new AntiDetectBrowser({ key: process.env.ANTI_DETECT_BROWSER_KEY })
const identities = [
{ profile: 'fixture-us-01', proxy: process.env.PROXY_US_1, tags: ['Windows 10', 'Chrome'] },
{ profile: 'fixture-us-02', proxy: process.env.PROXY_US_2, tags: ['Apple Mac', 'Safari'] },
{ profile: 'fixture-de-01', proxy: process.env.PROXY_DE_1, tags: ['Windows 10', 'Edge'] },
]
for (const id of identities) {
const { browser, page } = await ab.launch({
profile: id.profile, // isolated cookies, storage, login state
proxy: id.proxy, // from the environment, one per identity
fingerprint: { tags: id.tags }, // drawn once, frozen, replayed after
label: id.profile, // address-bar tag drawn by the kernel, unreadable from the page
})
// ... run the checks below, then ...
await browser.close()
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 146 lines · 220 tokens per session scan A 4609091e6601
multi-account-isolation is a skill published in the GitHub repository antibrow/anti-detect-browser-skills (218 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 220 tokens to every session and 2,587 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
tauri-mcp-cli
Use the Tauri MCP CLI to start and recover driver sessions, automate Tauri webviews, capture UI state, debug IPC, and work with mobile or remote devices. Use whenever an agent needs to operate a Tauri v2 app from terminal commands.
vibesurfer
Agent-native headless browser. 26 primitives over a Unix-socket wire protocol. Real WKWebView (macOS), WebKitGTK 6 (Linux), or WebView2 (Windows) — all three engines verified per-commit by a real-browser integration suite. Optimistic concurrency via state tokens; tree-delta wire format; durable session/page/auth state…
debug-failed-action
When your last vsact returned an unexpected result (NOTFOUND, no visible state change, suspected silent failure), run this skill with the action's pre-token. Pulls console errors, network failures, and current performance into one report.
anyapi
Get live data from LinkedIn, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, X/Twitter, Reddit, Facebook, Google Search, Google Maps, and Amazon, plus clean JSON from any web page that blocks bots - one key, USD pay-per-request, free trial built in. Use whenever a task needs third-party data that a direct fetch or a general web search…
browser-qa
Automated visual testing and browser interaction verification.
octoperf-real-browser-probe
Use when the user wants to run a real-browser probe alongside a JMeter HTTP load test to capture user-perceived metrics (page load time, render time, JS execution, Core Web Vitals) while JMeter generates the bulk HTTP load. Triggers on "real browser monitoring during load test", "EUM probe", "playwright probe"…