Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add anton-abyzov/specweave --skill donegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anton-abyzov/specweaveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/anton-abyzov/specweave/done)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anton-abyzov/specweave/done"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anton-abyzov/specweave/done.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 35 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- medium Tool Misuse · line 35 Tool defaults are unsafe or overly permissive (e.g. disabled TLS verification, no authentication, world-writable permissions). Unsafe defaults widen the attack surface.Fix: Override unsafe defaults with secure settings (verify=True, auth required, restrictive permissions). Review and harden all tool configurations.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00721 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00360 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00144 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
done scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 42 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Close Increment
Closure = verify → optional review → specweave complete. The only hard
gate is reports/verify.json with ok: true. Grill / judge / rubric reports
are optional evidence and never block.
Usage
sw:done <increment-id> # normal closure
sw:done <increment-id> --reason "<why>" # close without a green verify (recorded as metadata.closeReason)
Steps
- Ledger check:
specweave task list <id>. Every task must bedoneorskipped. Open/claimed tasks → go back tosw:do(ortask skip … --reason "<why>"). Release your own claims:specweave task release --all-mine. - Verify:
specweave verify <id>. Runstesting.commandsfrom config (elsenpm run test|lint|build,cargo test,pytest,go test ./...), writesreports/verify.md+reports/verify.json. Non-zero exit → fix, re-run. Do not proceed on red without a--reasonfrom the user. - Review (recommended for anything user-facing, optional otherwise): invoke
Skill({ skill: "sw:review" })— fresh context, adversarial, findings citepath:line, written toreports/review.md. Fix critical/high findings, re-run step 2 if code changed. - Docs touched? If the increment changed commands, config, or user-facing behaviour, update README/CHANGELOG/CLAUDE.md
## Commandsin the same commit. Living docs sync only iflivingDocsis enabled in config (specweave docs sync <id>). - Complete:
Bash({ command: "specweave complete <id> --yes" }). The CLI refuses whenverify.jsonis missing or not ok unless--reason "<text>"is given; it prints a notice whenreports/review.mdis absent; it setsstatus: completedand syncs GitHub/Jira/ADO when configured. Never editmetadata.jsonstatus by hand. - Handoff: if work continues elsewhere (follow-ups, another increment),
sw:handoff.
Report in one paragraph: verify result, review verdict (or "skipped"), commit sha(s), anything deferred.
Rules
- Never ask "should I close?" — closure follows automatically when tasks are done; the user can re-open.
--skip-validationexists for emergencies only; prefer--reasonso the reason is recorded.- Multi-agent sessions (
sw:team): only the lead runssw:done, after every agent has released and handed off. - Failed sync after completion:
specweave sync push <id>retries; closure itself already succeeded.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 42 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A cfe09f264af5
done is a skill published in the GitHub repository anton-abyzov/specweave (160 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 721 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
genie-orca-review
Independent, read-only review of a group, a wish, or a PR on Orca — SHIP / FIX-FIRST / BLOCKED with severity-tagged findings. Council and retro are this skill with a different input.
linear-graphql-skill
Operate Linear workspace issues, projects, and teams through Linear GraphQL API using UXC. Use when tasks require querying or creating issues, managing projects, or interacting with Linear workflow. Supports both Personal API Key and OAuth authentication.
ext-php-rs-bindings
ext-php-rs conventions for building PHP 8.2+ native extensions from a Rust core: phpclass/phpfunction macros, Zval conversion, PhpException mapping, php.ini loading, and PHPUnit testing. Load when generating or reviewing ext-php-rs PHP bindings for a Rust library.
go-conventions
Go code conventions covering Effective Go, error wrapping, golangci-lint, govulncheck, table-driven tests, interfaces, context usage, modules, and concurrency. Load when writing or reviewing Go code.
bindings
Cross-language binding architecture rules: bindings as minimal glue, canonical API surface ordering (core, ABI, language), per-language test suites in CI, generated-code discipline, and error/async boundary preservation. Load when designing or reviewing polyglot language bindings for a shared core.
ralphctl-test-driven-development
Execute-phase skill — write the failing test before the code that makes it pass; for bug fixes, this is the reproduction test itself. Use for any logic change, bug fix, or behavioural modification; for the full root-cause triage pipeline around an unexpected failure, see ralphctl-debugging-and-error-recovery.