Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to aoreshkov/oracle-forms-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aoreshkov/oracle-forms-mcp/main/.claude/skills/review-currency/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aoreshkov/oracle-forms-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aoreshkov/oracle-forms-mcp/review-currency)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aoreshkov/oracle-forms-mcp/review-currency"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aoreshkov/oracle-forms-mcp/review-currency/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aoreshkov/oracle-forms-mcp/review-currency"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aoreshkov/oracle-forms-mcp/review-currency.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00095 | $0.00902 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00451 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00180 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00090 |
Grade A, and why
review-currency scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to review-currency — 11 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Project currency review — expert panel
Run a currency review of this repository: how far its toolchain, dependencies, and practices have drifted from the latest official releases and recommendations as of today's date. Never judge currency from memory — every claim about "latest" must be verified by the expert subagents against official sources on the web today.
Workflow
1. Snapshot project state
Read these files and collect the facts the experts will need (versions, pins, action refs, base images). Note today's date — all research anchors to it.
gradle/libs.versions.toml— every version pin and its comments (comments mark deliberate pins)gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties— Gradle version.github/workflows/ci.yml,.github/workflows/codeql.yml,.github/workflows/release.ymlDockerfileandserver.jsonCLAUDE.md— project invariants and gotchas the experts must honor.claude/— agents, skills, rules, hooks,settings.json(the Claude Code setup itself)
2. Select the panel
The panel is six dedicated currency subagents (defined in .claude/agents/):
kotlin-currency, mcp-currency, deps-currency, ci-currency, security-currency,
claude-code-currency. Each agent carries its own persona, inspection list, official
sources, project gotchas, and output contract — they are the single source of truth.
If $ARGUMENTS is non-empty, launch only the experts whose keys it names (kotlin, mcp,
deps, ci, security, claude-code → the matching *-currency agent); otherwise launch
all six.
3. Launch the experts in parallel
Launch one subagent per selected expert, all in a single message, using the matching
*-currency agent type. Each agent already knows its brief and output contract, so the
prompt only needs to supply:
- The relevant snapshot facts from step 1 (versions, pins, action refs, base images).
- The absolute repo path and today's date.
- A reminder to return the standard findings table (Area | Current in repo | Latest official | Severity | Recommendation | Source URL) followed by ≤5 sentences of practice-level commentary — the agent's own definition spells this out in full.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 71 lines · 95 tokens per session scan A 5e175ca79444
review-currency is a skill published in the GitHub repository aoreshkov/oracle-forms-mcp (3 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 95 tokens to every session and 902 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to review-currency, differing in 11 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
Automated Refactoring with PMAT
Provides automated refactoring suggestions and complexity reduction strategies using PMAT (Pragmatic AI Labs MCP Agent Toolkit). Use this skill when: User requests code refactoring, optimization, or improvement Complexity analysis reveals high-complexity functions (cyclomatic > 10) Code review identifies…
code-review
Reviews a supplied code path or diff for correctness, security, maintainability, and style without executing or modifying it.
Code Quality Analysis with PMAT
Analyzes code quality, complexity, and technical debt using PMAT (Pragmatic AI Labs MCP Agent Toolkit). Use this skill when: User mentions "code quality", "complexity", "technical debt", or "maintainability" Reviewing code or conducting code review Modifying or refactoring existing code files Creating pull requests or…
knowledge-audit
Review and clean up stored memories — find duplicates, contradictions, stale entries, and consolidate.
review-guidelines
Additional code review guidelines specific to this codebase. Auto-loaded by the review agent during PR reviews to enforce project conventions.
gitnexus-pr-review
Use when the user wants to review a pull request, understand what a PR changes, assess risk of merging, or check for missing test coverage. Examples: "Review this PR", "What does PR #42 change?", "Is this PR safe to merge?".