gitnexus-pr-review

gitnexus-pr-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from VKirill/agent-consult. It costs 58 tokens per session (1,418 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A pull-request review guide that combines the code diff with GitNexus maps of affected code paths and dependencies.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review pull requests, assess merge risk, trace changed functions, inspect affected execution flows, and identify missing test coverage.
Why use it?
It helps reviewers understand what a proposed change does, what it may affect, and whether tests or safety checks may be missing.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review pull requests, assess merge risk, trace changed functions, inspect affected execution flows, and identify missing test coverage.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/vkirill/agent-consult/gitnexus-pr-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add VKirill/agent-consult --skill gitnexus-pr-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/VKirill/agent-consult

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for gitnexus-pr-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vkirill/agent-consult/gitnexus-pr-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vkirill/agent-consult/gitnexus-pr-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vkirill/agent-consult/gitnexus-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vkirill/agent-consult/gitnexus-pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for gitnexus-pr-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vkirill/agent-consult/gitnexus-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vkirill/agent-consult/gitnexus-pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 58 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,418 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00058 $0.01418
Opus 5 $0.00029 $0.00709
Sonnet 5 $0.00012 $0.00284
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00142

Measured 9d ago against content hash b499754c27e7, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gitnexus-pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/gitnexus-pr-review/SKILL.md · 168 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 168 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Usage

Loaded automatically when the description matches the active task. Specifics are documented in the body below.

PR Review with GitNexus

When to Use

  • "Review this PR"
  • "What does PR #42 change?"
  • "Is this safe to merge?"
  • "What's the blast radius of this PR?"
  • "Are there missing tests for this PR?"
  • Reviewing someone else's code changes before merge

Workflow

1. gh pr diff <number>                                    → Get the raw diff
2. gitnexus_detect_changes({scope: "compare", base_ref: "main"})  → Map diff to affected flows
3. For each changed symbol:
   gitnexus_impact({target: "<symbol>", direction: "upstream"})    → Blast radius per change
4. gitnexus_context({name: "<key symbol>"})               → Understand callers/callees
5. READ gitnexus://repo/{name}/processes                   → Check affected execution flows
6. Summarize findings with risk assessment

If "Index is stale" → run npx gitnexus analyze in terminal before reviewing.

Checklist

- [ ] Fetch PR diff (gh pr diff or git diff base...head)
- [ ] gitnexus_detect_changes to map changes to affected execution flows
- [ ] gitnexus_impact on each non-trivial changed symbol
- [ ] Review d=1 items (WILL BREAK) — are callers updated?
- [ ] gitnexus_context on key changed symbols to understand full picture
- [ ] Check if affected processes have test coverage
- [ ] Assess overall risk level
- [ ] Write review summary with findings

Review Dimensions

Dimension How GitNexus Helps
Correctness context shows callers — are they all compatible with the change?
Blast radius impact shows d=1/d=2/d=3 dependents — anything missed?
Completeness detect_changes shows all affected flows — are they all handled?
Test coverage impact({includeTests: true}) shows which tests touch changed code
Breaking changes d=1 upstream items that aren't updated in the PR = potential breakage

Risk Assessment

Read the full file on GitHub · 168 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 168 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A b499754c27e7

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gitnexus-pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository VKirill/agent-consult (1 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,418 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.