Apache Magpie is a framework of agent-assisted workflows for maintaining Apache software projects, including issue triage, pull-request review, contributor mentoring, and security-report handling. Apache maintainers and developers use it to delegate repetitive project work to coding agents while retaining human review. Its catalogue entries are the skills, instructions, plugin, and settings that implement these workflows.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add apache/magpie --skill pre-first-pr-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/apache/magpieWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/apache/magpie/pre-first-pr-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/apache/magpie/pre-first-pr-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/apache/magpie/pre-first-pr-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/apache/magpie/pre-first-pr-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/apache/magpie/pre-first-pr-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Prompt Injection · line 26 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.02696 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.01078 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00539 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00270 |
Grade A, and why
pre-first-pr-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 206 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
pre-first-pr-check
Pre-flight — is this project set up?
Do this first, before anything else in this skill, and do it silently. One command answers it and carries its own rules; there is nothing else to read.
Run the checker with this skill's own frontmatter name: and
surface_hash:, and one --requires for each requires_config: entry:
PYTHONPATH=".apache-magpie-local:$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir 2>/dev/null || echo .git)/../.apache-magpie-local:$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir 2>/dev/null || echo .git)/apache-magpie:.svn/apache-magpie" \
python3 -m setup_preflight --skill <name> --hash <surface_hash> [--requires <file>]...
The path finds the checker /magpie-setup:setup config installed in the
personal layer: this checkout's .apache-magpie-local/, the main
checkout's when this is a linked worktree, or, when Magpie is only
installed, the git directory's apache-magpie/ (.svn/apache-magpie/
in a Subversion working copy).
{"verdict": "ok"}→ silent. Continue into the work the user asked for and say nothing about pre-flight. This is the ordinary answer.{"verdict": "action", ...}→ each finding names a section, andrulescarries that section's text. Follow it. Thefactsare the inputs; what to propose, and what may not be done, are in the rules rather than here. Act on a finding only through its rules.- The command did not run at all — no such module, a non-zero exit, no
python3— → never read that as a pass, and do not re-derive the check by hand: it lives in code so that there is one version of it. If the project has no.apache-magpie.lock,.apache-magpie-overrides/, or personal layer (any of the directories above), nothing has been set up here and there is nothing to reconcile — resolve this skill'srequires_config:entries yourself (first match wins:.apache-magpie-local/<file>, the main checkout's.apache-magpie-local/<file>,<git-common-dir>/apache-magpie/<file>,.svn/apache-magpie/<file>, then.apache-magpie-overrides/<file>), stay silent if they all resolve, and run/magpie-setup:setup configfor this skill if any does not, which also installs the checker. Otherwise the project is set up and its checker is missing or stale: say so, propose/magpie-setup:setup configto install it or/magpie-setup:setup upgradeto refresh it, and carry on with the work.
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- classifications/category-a-spdx.md 610 B
- classifications/category-b-commit-shape.md 889 B
- classifications/category-c-placeholders.md 515 B
- classifications/category-d-contributing.md 551 B
- classifications/category-e-injection.md 435 B
- classifications/nothing-to-check.md 189 B
- classifications/readiness-advisory-only.md 204 B
- classifications/readiness-blocking.md 375 B
- classifications/readiness-ready.md 192 B
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +1 lines f72fa2fda5e7
- 11d ago Changed · +2 lines fa47c993ad7a
- 16d ago Changed · -152 lines 4ff6197414b3
- 21d ago Changed · +15 lines da4323ecd35b
- 27d ago Changed · -9 lines 8561aab74e1d
- 1mo ago Changed · -1 tokens per session e4e80f19f1d7
- 1mo ago Changed · +6 lines 81f39d10b1da
- 1mo ago Changed · -2 tokens per session f5e7391d2578
- 1mo ago Changed · -94 lines 2c33599788e2
- 1mo ago First seen · 437 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 1a901a80838e
pre-first-pr-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository apache/magpie (128 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 2,696 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
release-pr-review
Review pass on an open release PR (release/ → main) — the step between git-wrapup and release-and-publish when a project releases in gated release PR mode. Reads the PR's commit range through the code-simplifier lens plus a correctness review, verifies whatever an automated reviewer left on the PR, lands fixes as…
pr
Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.
otto-pr-review-loop
Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.
engram-branch-pr
PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.
github-contributor
A step-by-step guide for contributing code, tests, documentation, or build changes to open-source projects you do not maintain. It explains how to prepare a pull request that follows the project’s rules and is easier for maintainers to review.
revdiff
Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…