Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Aperivue/medsci-skills --skill author-strategygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/author-strategy)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/author-strategy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/author-strategy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/author-strategy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/author-strategy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.02208 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01104 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00442 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00221 |
Grade A, and why
author-strategy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 187 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/author-strategy — PubMed Author Strategy Analysis
Purpose
Analyze a researcher's PubMed publication portfolio to reverse-engineer their research strategy. Produces a CSV dataset, 7 visualizations, and a strategy report.
Prerequisites
- Python 3.10+ with
biopython,pandas,matplotlib,seaborn, andpyyaml(PyYAML is required by the archetype classifier and the rubric renderer) - Scripts:
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/fetch_pubmed.py,${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/analyze_patterns.py,${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/pubmed_parse.py(stdlib parser),${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/classify_archetypes.py,${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/render_archetype_doc.py - Rubric:
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/trajectory_archetypes.yaml(canonical) and${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/trajectory_archetypes.md(generated)
Workflow
Step 1: Gather Input
Ask the user for:
- Author name (PubMed format, e.g., "Kim DK" or "Lee KS")
- Last name for position classification (auto-detected if ambiguous)
- Output directory (default:
~/.local/cache/author-strategy/{AuthorName}/)
Step 2: Fetch PubMed Data
python "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/fetch_pubmed.py" "{Author Name}" \
--last-name "{LastName}" \
--output "{output_dir}/data/{name}_publications.csv" \
--email "{user_email}"
Review the console summary (total count, study type distribution, author position). If count is 0, suggest alternative name formats (e.g., "Yon DK" vs "Yon D" vs "Yon Dong Keon").
Step 3: Generate Visualizations and Report
python "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/analyze_patterns.py" "{output_dir}/data/{name}_publications.csv" \
--output-dir "{output_dir}/report/" \
--author-name "{Author Name}"
This produces:
- 7 PNG charts (01-07)
analysis_report.mdwith strategy breakdown
Step 4: Interpret and Present
Read analysis_report.md and present to the user:
- Executive summary: total publications, growth trajectory, high-tier rate
- Primary strategy: what study type dominates and why
- Author position analysis: first/last positional rate vs middle (positional heuristic only — not leadership or corresponding-author metadata, which are unavailable here)
- Topic clusters: research focus areas
- ROI quadrant: which strategies yield high-tier + leadership vs. volume only
- Replication opportunities: which patterns are replicable with Claude Code + public databases
What ships with it
11 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- analyze_patterns.py 13 KB runs code
- classify_archetypes.py 20 KB runs code
- fetch_pubmed.py 11 KB runs code
- pubmed_parse.py 14 KB runs code
- references/trajectory_archetypes.md 8.7 KB
- references/trajectory_archetypes.yaml 16 KB
- render_archetype_doc.py 7.2 KB runs code
- skill.yml 1.8 KB
- tests/fixtures/sample_corpus.csv 732 B
- tests/fixtures/two_samesurname_authors.xml 1.8 KB
- tests/test_archetype_classifier.sh 13 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 187 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 9c97ad0ff206
author-strategy is a skill published in the GitHub repository Aperivue/medsci-skills (292 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 2,208 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
clinical-trials-search
Search ClinicalTrials.gov with natural language queries. Find clinical trials, enrollment, and outcomes using Valyu semantic search.
shidi
A Chinese-language research assistant role that turns a user’s ideas into literature reviews, experiment plans, figures and organised data.
clinical-research
Use when designing a prospective clinical study before submission — selecting and classifying endpoints (primary / key-secondary / exploratory, with surrogate-endpoint flagging), estimating sample size and power for two-arm designs (means / proportions / survival), or scoring a study plan for feasibility and a GO /…
sr-search-record
An automated literature-review search and screening workflow using OpenAlex, an open database and API for scholarly research, and Zotero, a reference manager.
review-synthesis
A literature-review workflow that combines evidence from the full text of selected research papers into a findings document. It uses different review methods for systematic, semi-systematic, and integrative reviews.
review-draft
A workflow for expanding a first draft of a review article into a structured academic manuscript. A review article combines and organizes existing research rather than reporting a new experiment.