humanize

humanize is a skill for Claude Code from Aperivue/medsci-skills. It costs 55 tokens per session (2,875 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An academic writing editor that looks for common patterns associated with AI-generated prose in medical manuscripts and replies to peer reviewers. It rewrites flagged passages while preserving technical claims, numbers, and citations.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing and revising academic manuscripts and response letters, especially when the writer wants to remove repetitive or unnatural AI-style wording.
Why use it?
It helps make drafts sound more natural without changing their scientific meaning. It also limits revisions so unrelated parts of the document are not rewritten.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR} variable.

Part of the medsci-writing plugin — 7 skills shipped together

Good fit Reviewing and revising academic manuscripts and response letters, especially when the writer wants to remove repetitive or unnatural AI-style wording.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/humanize
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Aperivue/medsci-skills --skill humanize
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install medsci-writing, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 7 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for humanize

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/humanize/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/humanize)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/humanize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/humanize/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for humanize

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/humanize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/humanize.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 55 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,875 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00055 $0.02875
Opus 5.5 $0.00022 $0.01150
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00575
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00287

Measured 22d ago against content hash 6aebc1ff5204, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

humanize scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 4 executable files (scripts/check_rewrite_fidelity.py, scripts/check_sentence_variety.py, tests/test_rewrite_fidelity.sh, …), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/humanize/SKILL.md · 164 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 164 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Humanize Skill

This skill only removes AI patterns; it does not perform general copy-editing, evaluate scientific quality, check journal formatting, or translate.

Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/ai_patterns.md at the start of every session, before scanning: the definitions, watch words, examples, detection greps, per-pattern fixes and the section-by-section priorities for all 27 patterns live only there.


Workflow

Phase 1: Scan

Scan the section(s) the user provides for all 27 patterns. For response-to-reviewers letters and cover letters, prioritise Patterns 22-24. For a full manuscript, follow the per-section priorities in ai_patterns.md (Section-Specific Application Guide). For each pattern found, record its number and name, the count, the exact passage, and its location (paragraph number or line range).

Output: Pattern Frequency Table

## AI Pattern Scan Report

Section: {section name}
Word count: {N}

| # | Pattern | Count | Severity | Example from text |
|---|---------|-------|----------|-------------------|
| 1 | Significance inflation | 3 | HIGH | "...pivotal role in diagnostic imaging..." |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

Patterns not detected: 2, 4, 9, 14, 15

Total AI pattern instances: {N}
AI pattern density: {N per 1000 words}

Phase 2: Report

  • Severity per pattern: HIGH (>3 occurrences), MEDIUM (1-3), LOW (0, clean).
  • Density: total instances across all 27 patterns per 1000 words. Target: < 2.0.

Gate: Present the report and ask the user which patterns to fix. Default: fix all HIGH and MEDIUM.

Phase 3: Fix

Rewrite flagged passages with each pattern's fix from ai_patterns.md, under these rules:

  1. Preserve technical accuracy. Every number, statistic, p-value, confidence interval, and clinical fact must remain identical.
  2. Preserve citations. Never add, remove, or relocate a citation.
  3. Keep the formal academic register of an experienced radiologist writing for peers in a top-tier journal. Never make the text casual or conversational.
  4. Keep domain-specific terminology intact. "Convolutional neural network," "apparent diffusion coefficient," "Fleiss' kappa" stay as-is.
  5. Never introduce new claims, remove existing ones, or change a sentence's meaning — rephrase, never reinterpret. If a passage cannot be fixed without changing its meaning, leave it and flag it for the user.
  6. Use active voice where natural: "We analyzed" rather than "Analysis was performed."
  7. Vary sentence structure. Mix short declarative sentences (8-12 words) with longer ones (25-35 words). A de-AI pass tends to flatten rhythm — it shortens the long sentences and pads the short ones toward a comfortable middle, which is itself a tell. scripts/check_sentence_variety.py verifies this rule in Phase 4.
  8. Thin out antithesis and cleft constructions (Pattern 27, the M2 heuristic). For each "X rather than Y", "not X but Y" or "X, not Y", apply the negative-form test: delete the negative half and rewrite the clause in the positive. If a fact disappears, the contrast was functional — keep it; if nothing disappears, it was decoration — cut it. Judge by the manuscript's overall rate, not instance by instance, and keep two or three for emphasis. Rewrite clefts ("What … is …", "It is … that …") in plain subject-verb order ("What matters is X" → "X matters"). scripts/check_rhetorical_density.py (in /self-review) measures this in Phase 4.

Read the full file on GitHub · 164 lines

Files

What ships with it

31 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 22d ago Changed · +4 lines 6aebc1ff5204
  2. 24d ago Changed · -136 lines · -2 tokens per session ad2a213dc507
  3. 25d ago Changed 71f3eeb71f63
  4. 1mo ago First seen · 296 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 0372a021d140

Subscribe to this mod's changes

humanize is a skill published in the GitHub repository Aperivue/medsci-skills (349 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 2,875 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

clinical-trials-search

Search ClinicalTrials.gov with natural language queries. Find clinical trials, enrollment, and outcomes using Valyu semantic search.

beita6969/ScienceClaw · 28 tokens

shidi

A Chinese-language research assistant role that turns a user’s ideas into literature reviews, experiment plans, figures and organised data.

IcyCreamDAS/shidi-skill · 126 tokens

clinical-research

Use when designing a prospective clinical study before submission — selecting and classifying endpoints (primary / key-secondary / exploratory, with surrogate-endpoint flagging), estimating sample size and power for two-arm designs (means / proportions / survival), or scoring a study plan for feasibility and a GO /…

bestagentkits/agency-skills · 152 tokens

sr-search-record

An automated literature-review search and screening workflow using OpenAlex, an open database and API for scholarly research, and Zotero, a reference manager.

qiaomiaojoe/ai-academic-workflow · 354 tokens

review-draft

A workflow for expanding a first draft of a review article into a structured academic manuscript. A review article combines and organizes existing research rather than reporting a new experiment.

qiaomiaojoe/ai-academic-workflow · 284 tokens

review-synthesis

A literature-review workflow that combines evidence from the full text of selected research papers into a findings document. It uses different review methods for systematic, semi-systematic, and integrative reviews.

qiaomiaojoe/ai-academic-workflow · 288 tokens