Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Aperivue/medsci-skills --skill model-assessmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/model-assessment)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/model-assessment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/model-assessment/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/model-assessment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/model-assessment.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.04393 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.01757 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00879 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00439 |
Grade A, and why
model-assessment scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 259 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Model-Assessment Skill
Assess a trained medical-imaging model (in-house, vendor or open-weights; segmentation, classification or detection) in the order the evidence is built: Part A designs and audits the validation study, Part B computes task-correct held-out metrics, Part C adds the uncertainty / OOD / abstention layer a deployment claim needs, and Part D makes an explainability analysis survive review. Run the parts the request needs (a Grad-CAM question starts at Part D), but no metric headline is reported before the Part A split gate is green. Each part ends in a stdlib gate whose verdict is reproduced from a file — never report a pass without running it.
Numbers come only from code executed on the supplied predictions, split table, or the researcher's executed UQ/XAI code; if predictions or ground truth are missing, say so and stop. Integrate MONAI / nnU-Net, MAPIE, captum, pytorch-grad-cam and pretrained OOD scorers by reference — never reimplement them, never build or train the model, never run a model on real patient data.
Elsewhere: building/training → /model-scaffold; choosing or vetting the model →
/model-selection; data-stage preprocessing leakage → /imaging-data; paired model comparison /
added value over a baseline / decision curves / MRMC / ICC / calibration tables → /analyze-stats
(added value: incremental_value.md); AI-vs-expert reader rubric
and IRR → /design-ai-benchmarking; LLM/MLLM → /mllm-eval; general validity → /design-study;
classical-ML tabular calibration → /radiomics-ml; item-by-item reporting audit →
/check-reporting; a finished manuscript → /self-review or /peer-review (the MD0–MD11
model_development.md probe).
Part A — Validation design
The rationale behind Phases 2–7 — the full leakage taxonomy, the internal-vs-external ladder,
comparator design, run variance, test-set sizing, the reporting map — is in
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/validation_design.md (load on demand). Verify citations via
/search-lit (confirmed DOI/PMID), else mark [UNVERIFIED - NEEDS MANUAL CHECK]; flag an uncertain
CLAIM 2024 / TRIPOD+AI / Metrics Reloaded item [VERIFY] and ask.
What ships with it
60 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/explainability_guide.md 4.1 KB
- references/metric_guide.md 8.5 KB
- references/metric_selection_grounding.md 12 KB
- references/metrics_manifest_schema.md 5.4 KB
- references/uncertainty_guide.md 6.0 KB
- references/validation_design.md 14 KB
- scripts/check_explainability_report_challenge/expected/strong.txt 393 B
- scripts/check_explainability_report_challenge/expected/weak.txt 878 B
- scripts/check_explainability_report_challenge/fixture/report_strong.json 238 B
- scripts/check_explainability_report_challenge/fixture/report_weak.json 163 B
- scripts/check_explainability_report_challenge/problem.md 805 B
- scripts/check_explainability_report_challenge/verify.sh 2.0 KB runs code
- scripts/check_explainability_report.py 12 KB runs code
- scripts/check_metric_reporting.py 34 KB runs code
- scripts/check_split_leakage_challenge/expected/clean.txt 395 B
- scripts/check_split_leakage_challenge/expected/leak.txt 507 B
- scripts/check_split_leakage_challenge/fixture/split_seed.txt 3 B
- scripts/check_split_leakage_challenge/fixture/splits_clean.csv 150 B
- scripts/check_split_leakage_challenge/fixture/splits_leak.csv 145 B
- scripts/check_split_leakage_challenge/problem.md 2.3 KB
- scripts/check_split_leakage_challenge/verify.sh 1.9 KB runs code
- scripts/check_split_leakage.py 13 KB runs code
- scripts/check_uncertainty_reporting_challenge/expected/strong.txt 411 B
- scripts/check_uncertainty_reporting_challenge/expected/weak.txt 1.0 KB
- scripts/check_uncertainty_reporting_challenge/fixture/uncertainty_strong.json 323 B
- scripts/check_uncertainty_reporting_challenge/fixture/uncertainty_weak.json 204 B
- scripts/check_uncertainty_reporting_challenge/problem.md 2.4 KB
- scripts/check_uncertainty_reporting_challenge/verify.sh 2.1 KB runs code
- scripts/check_uncertainty_reporting.py 15 KB runs code
- scripts/metric_reporting_challenge/fixture/clf_bad.md 84 B
- scripts/metric_reporting_challenge/fixture/clf_good.md 186 B
- scripts/metric_reporting_challenge/fixture/det_good_wrapped.md 285 B
- scripts/metric_reporting_challenge/fixture/det_no_iou.md 224 B
- scripts/metric_reporting_challenge/fixture/generative_bad.md 134 B
- scripts/metric_reporting_challenge/fixture/generative_good.md 437 B
- scripts/metric_reporting_challenge/fixture/interactive_bad.md 128 B
- scripts/metric_reporting_challenge/fixture/interactive_good.md 500 B
- scripts/metric_reporting_challenge/fixture/manifest_clf_bad.json 193 B
- scripts/metric_reporting_challenge/fixture/manifest_det_no_match.json 79 B
- scripts/metric_reporting_challenge/fixture/manifest_seg_bad.json 85 B
- scripts/metric_reporting_challenge/fixture/manifest_seg_good.json 75 B
- scripts/metric_reporting_challenge/fixture/multiclass_bad.md 128 B
- scripts/metric_reporting_challenge/fixture/seg_bad.md 119 B
- scripts/metric_reporting_challenge/fixture/seg_good.md 207 B
- scripts/metric_reporting_challenge/problem.md 2.4 KB
- scripts/metric_reporting_challenge/verify.sh 3.6 KB runs code
- skill.yml 7.6 KB
- templates/metrics_manifest.json 615 B
- tests/fixtures/clean_imageid_case.csv 66 B
- tests/fixtures/clean_imageid_case3class.csv 119 B
- tests/fixtures/clean_imageid_case4class.csv 209 B
- tests/fixtures/clean_imageid_casecontrol.csv 62 B
- tests/fixtures/clean_participant_site_id.csv 104 B
- tests/fixtures/clean_patient_visit_no.csv 94 B
- tests/fixtures/clean_subject_sex_code.csv 76 B
- tests/fixtures/leak_imageid_case.csv 66 B
- tests/fixtures/leak_studyid_mrn.csv 73 B
- tests/fixtures/leak_subject.csv 62 B
- tests/fixtures/noseed_clean.csv 50 B
- tests/fixtures/only_image_study_ids.csv 59 B
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago Changed · +4 lines cfb3fcd9c408
- 13d ago Changed · +12 lines 38e72392ab97
- 15d ago First seen · 243 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A df3082f1ecf1
model-assessment is a skill published in the GitHub repository Aperivue/medsci-skills (340 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 4,393 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-01.
Other skills, from other repositories
genomic-intelligence
Predicts regulatory features, gene structure, and expression directly from DNA sequence using Genomic Intelligence's hosted transformer DNA language models — no local GPU or model weights. Six tasks over a REST API and a hosted MCP server (keyless public demo): promoter regions, splice donor/acceptor sites, enhancer…
torch-geometric
Supports PyTorch Geometric (PyG) graph neural networks — node/link/graph classification, message passing (GCN, GAT, GraphSAGE, GIN), heterogeneous graphs, neighbor sampling, and custom datasets. Use when working with torchgeometric, not for general NetworkX analytics or non-graph PyTorch models.
aeon
This skill should be used for time series machine learning tasks including classification, regression, clustering, forecasting, anomaly detection, segmentation, and similarity search. Use when working with temporal data, sequential patterns, or time-indexed observations requiring specialized algorithms beyond standard…
bids
Organizes, queries, validates, and converts Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) datasets. Supports organizing neuroscience and biomedical data (MRI, EEG, MEG, iEEG, PET, microscopy, NIRS, motion capture, EMG, MR spectroscopy, behavioral), querying BIDS layouts, validating compliance, converting DICOM to BIDS, writing…
bulk-rnaseq
Prepares bulk RNA-seq FASTQ, Salmon, STAR or featureCounts output for gene-level differential expression. Covers nf-core/rnaseq and standalone quantification, biological replication, strandedness, reference provenance, validated count assembly and a PyDESeq2 handoff. Use for FASTQ-to-counts analysis, nf-core/rnaseq…
geniml
Supports audited local Geniml genomic-interval workflows: validate BED and universe contracts, plan Region2Vec or scEmbed runs, inspect model/tokenizer compatibility, and assess consensus universes.