Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Aperivue/medsci-skills --skill radiomics-mlgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/radiomics-ml)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/radiomics-ml"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/radiomics-ml/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/radiomics-ml"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aperivue/medsci-skills/radiomics-ml.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00223 | $0.02036 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00112 | $0.01018 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00045 | $0.00407 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00204 |
Grade A, and why
radiomics-ml scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 135 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Radiomics / Classical-ML Skill
Purpose
Radiomics + tree-ensemble studies (features → random forest / XGBoost → a clinical outcome) are the most common solo-doable clinical-ML workflow — no GPU, no engineer — and the most commonly over-optimistic: hundreds-to-thousands of features on tens of patients, hyperparameters tuned on the same folds the performance is reported from, features selected on the whole dataset, unstable features never filtered, and discrimination (AUC) reported without calibration. This skill produces the pipeline correctly and audits an existing one, so the clinical result survives review (Lambin 2017; CLEAR; TRIPOD+AI; PROBAST-AI).
It sits beside the imaging-DL lane: where /model-scaffold builds a deep network, radiomics-ml
covers the feature-based classical-ML path. It integrates scikit-learn / xgboost / pyradiomics
(referenced in the emitted code); it does not reimplement them and never runs a model on real patient
data.
When to use
- You have a radiomics or clinical/tabular feature table and want to build a random-forest / XGBoost clinical prediction model that will pass statistical review.
- You want to audit an existing radiomics/ML pipeline for the failure modes below.
When NOT to use
- Deep-learning imaging models →
/architecture-zoo→/model-scaffold→/model-validation. - Classical inferential statistics / a regression model as the estimand →
/analyze-stats. - Interpretability of a trained network →
/explainability. - Reimplementing scikit-learn / xgboost / pyradiomics → out of scope (this skill wires and audits them).
The failure modes (what the gate enforces)
- No nested CV. Tuning and reporting on the same folds inflates performance. Use nested CV or a held-out test set.
- High dimensionality, low events. Features ≥ events with no dimensionality reduction overfits — the classic radiomics trap. Apply LASSO / PCA / a stability + redundancy filter.
- Selection outside the fold. Feature selection fit on the whole dataset leaks the held-out folds. Nest selection inside each training fold.
- No feature stability. Radiomics features are unstable across acquisition/segmentation — filter to reproducible features (ICC / test-retest).
- No calibration. A clinical prediction model needs calibration (slope/intercept + a flexible curve), not discrimination alone.
- No external validation. A single-cohort model needs external / temporal validation for a clinical claim.
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/radiomics_ml_guide.md 6.5 KB
- scripts/check_radiomics_ml_challenge/expected/strong.txt 369 B
- scripts/check_radiomics_ml_challenge/expected/weak.txt 1.4 KB
- scripts/check_radiomics_ml_challenge/fixture/pipeline_strong.json 322 B
- scripts/check_radiomics_ml_challenge/fixture/pipeline_weak.json 313 B
- scripts/check_radiomics_ml_challenge/problem.md 894 B
- scripts/check_radiomics_ml_challenge/verify.sh 1.9 KB runs code
- scripts/check_radiomics_ml.py 10.0 KB runs code
- skill.yml 3.7 KB
- tests/test_radiomics_ml.sh 4.2 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 135 lines · 223 tokens per session scan A cc65bfd50db2
radiomics-ml is a skill published in the GitHub repository Aperivue/medsci-skills (292 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 223 tokens to every session and 2,036 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
torch-geometric
PyTorch Geometric (PyG) for graph neural networks — node/link/graph classification, message passing (GCN, GAT, GraphSAGE, GIN), heterogeneous graphs, neighbor sampling, and custom datasets. Use when working with torchgeometric, not for general NetworkX analytics or non-graph PyTorch models.
aeon
This skill should be used for time series machine learning tasks including classification, regression, clustering, forecasting, anomaly detection, segmentation, and similarity search. Use when working with temporal data, sequential patterns, or time-indexed observations requiring specialized algorithms beyond standard…
bids
Use this skill when working with Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) datasets: organizing neuroscience and biomedical data (MRI, EEG, MEG, iEEG, PET, microscopy, NIRS, motion capture, EMG, MR spectroscopy, behavioral), querying BIDS layouts, validating compliance, converting DICOM to BIDS, writing metadata sidecars…
bulk-rnaseq
End-to-end bulk RNA-seq orchestrator — takes raw FASTQ reads through QC and trimming (FastQC, fastp/Trim Galore), alignment and quantification (STAR, Salmon, featureCounts), assembles a gene-level counts matrix, then hands off to differential expression (pydeseq2), pathway/GSEA enrichment (pathway-enrichment), and…
esm
Use when working directly with the esm Python SDK, ESM3 or ESMC model IDs, Forge/Biohub inference clients, or ESMFold2 folding workflows.
geniml
Use Geniml for audited local genomic-interval workflows: validate BED and universe contracts, plan Region2Vec or scEmbed runs, inspect model/tokenizer compatibility, and assess consensus universes.