test-driven-development

test-driven-development is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ApexIQ/skillsmith. It costs 30 tokens per session (545 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A test-first development workflow, commonly called TDD, where a failing test is written before the code that should make it pass.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to develop features by writing a failing test, implementing the minimum code to pass it, and then refactoring while keeping the test passing.
Why use it?
It clarifies expected behavior early and helps catch regressions while code is changed or cleaned up.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/apexiq/skillsmith/test_driven_development
Any agent
npx skills add ApexIQ/skillsmith --skill test_driven_development
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ApexIQ/skillsmith

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 30 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 545 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00030 $0.00545
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.00272
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00109
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00055

Measured 3d ago against content hash db429da35a25, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

test-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agent/skills/test_driven_development/SKILL.md · 72 lines

What it actually says

🔴🟢♻️ Test-Driven Development (TDD)

Philosophy: Red -> Green -> Refactor. Write failing tests first, make them pass, then improve.

Workflow

1. 🔴 Red (Write Failing Test)

  • Before writing any implementation code, create a test file.
  • Write a test that describes the expected behavior.
  • Run the test. It MUST fail. If it passes, the test is wrong.

2. 🟢 Green (Make it Pass)

  • Write the minimum code required to make the test pass.
  • Do not over-engineer. Do not add features not yet tested.
  • Run the test. It MUST pass.

3. ♻️ Refactor (Improve the Code)

  • Clean up the implementation. Remove duplication. Improve naming.
  • Run the test again. It MUST still pass.
  • Commit your work.

Examples

Backend (pytest):

# 1. Red - Write test first
def test_calculate_discount_applies_percentage(self):
    result = calculate_discount(100, 0.1)
    assert result == 90  # This will fail initially

# 2. Green - Minimal implementation
def calculate_discount(price, percentage):
    return price * (1 - percentage)

# 3. Refactor - Improve if needed

Frontend (Testing Library):

// 1. Red
test('clicking delete removes item from list', async () => {
  render(<ItemList items={mockItems} />);
  await user.click(screen.getByRole('button', { version: 0.1.0
name: /delete/i }));
  expect(screen.queryByText(mockItems[0].name)).not.toBeInTheDocument();
});

Benefits of TDD

  • Forces you to think about API before implementation.
  • Builds a safety net for future refactoring.
  • Documentation through tests.

Guidelines

  • One test = one concept. Don't test multiple behaviors in one test.
  • Tests should be independent and runnable in any order.
  • Treat test code with the same respect as production code.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 72 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A db429da35a25

Subscribe to this mod's changes

test-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository ApexIQ/skillsmith (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 545 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.