Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ApexIQ/skillsmith --skill test_driven_developmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ApexIQ/skillsmithWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/apexiq/skillsmith/test_driven_development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/apexiq/skillsmith/test_driven_development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/apexiq/skillsmith/test_driven_development/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/apexiq/skillsmith/test_driven_development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/apexiq/skillsmith/test_driven_development.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00545 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00218 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00109 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
test-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
🔴🟢♻️ Test-Driven Development (TDD)
Philosophy: Red -> Green -> Refactor. Write failing tests first, make them pass, then improve.
Workflow
1. 🔴 Red (Write Failing Test)
- Before writing any implementation code, create a test file.
- Write a test that describes the expected behavior.
- Run the test. It MUST fail. If it passes, the test is wrong.
2. 🟢 Green (Make it Pass)
- Write the minimum code required to make the test pass.
- Do not over-engineer. Do not add features not yet tested.
- Run the test. It MUST pass.
3. ♻️ Refactor (Improve the Code)
- Clean up the implementation. Remove duplication. Improve naming.
- Run the test again. It MUST still pass.
- Commit your work.
Examples
Backend (pytest):
# 1. Red - Write test first
def test_calculate_discount_applies_percentage(self):
result = calculate_discount(100, 0.1)
assert result == 90 # This will fail initially
# 2. Green - Minimal implementation
def calculate_discount(price, percentage):
return price * (1 - percentage)
# 3. Refactor - Improve if needed
Frontend (Testing Library):
// 1. Red
test('clicking delete removes item from list', async () => {
render(<ItemList items={mockItems} />);
await user.click(screen.getByRole('button', { version: 0.1.0
name: /delete/i }));
expect(screen.queryByText(mockItems[0].name)).not.toBeInTheDocument();
});
Benefits of TDD
- Forces you to think about API before implementation.
- Builds a safety net for future refactoring.
- Documentation through tests.
Guidelines
- One test = one concept. Don't test multiple behaviors in one test.
- Tests should be independent and runnable in any order.
- Treat test code with the same respect as production code.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 72 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A db429da35a25
test-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository ApexIQ/skillsmith (5 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 545 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
tdd
Use this skill to practice test-driven development — writing tests before implementation, using tests to drive design, and validating implementation against pre-written tests. Activates when implementing new functionality, refactoring code, or fixing bugs where regression coverage is needed.
test-writing
Writes meaningful tests that actually catch bugs.
dev-tdd
TDD development with Red-Green-Refactor cycle. Use to implement a feature by writing tests BEFORE the code. Trigger automatically when the user asks for TDD, wants to write tests first, mentions "test first", or asks to implement, add, create, fix, correct code, a new feature, a bugfix, or a functionality.
Test Driven Development
Strict Red-Green-Refactor implementation methodology for high quality, regression-free software.
test-writing
Write tests that catch real regressions — behavior-focused, minimal mocking, edge cases chosen from the code's actual branches. Use when adding tests for new code or backfilling tests for a fix.
Testing
Write comprehensive tests using TDD, maintain test coverage, and follow testing best practices.