Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojo --skill test-writinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojo/test-writing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojo/test-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojo/test-writing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojo/test-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojo/test-writing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 46 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.01037 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00415 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00207 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00104 |
Grade A, and why
test-writing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 117 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Writing Skill
Produces tests that fail when the code is wrong — not tests that exist for coverage theatre. Covers happy path, edge cases, error paths, and state transitions. Does NOT chase 100% coverage as a goal; chases meaningful coverage that catches real regressions.
When to Use
- Writing tests for new code or features.
- Adding coverage to an untested area before changing it.
- A bug slipped through that tests should have caught.
- Practicing test-driven development.
- The
verify-before-doneskill flagged missing coverage. - NOT when the user explicitly asked for a spike or throwaway script.
Prerequisites
- A test framework installed for the stack (pytest, vitest, jest, go test, xUnit, JUnit).
- Ability to run the test suite via the
powershelltool. - The
view,edit, andgreptools to read existing patterns. - A baseline run of the existing suite passing.
How to Run
1. Read existing tests with `view`/`grep` to copy the project's pattern.
2. List scenarios: happy path, edges, errors, state transitions.
3. Write one test per scenario using Arrange-Act-Assert.
4. Run the suite — confirm new tests pass and nothing else broke.
5. If TDD: write the test first, watch it fail for the right reason, then implement.
Quick Reference
| Stack | Framework | Run command |
|---|---|---|
| TypeScript | Vitest / Jest | npm test or npx vitest |
| Python | pytest | pytest or python -m pytest |
| Java | JUnit 5 | mvn test or gradle test |
| Go | testing | go test ./... |
| .NET | xUnit | dotnet test |
| Scenario type | Must cover |
|---|---|
| Happy path | Valid input → expected output |
| Edge case | Empty, null, boundary, maximum size |
| Error case | Invalid input, dependency failure, timeout |
| State transition | Stateful object moves between valid states |
Procedure
Step 1: Read the Existing Pattern
Use grep for test_* or *.spec.* files and view one of them. Match the project's naming, location, fixtures, and assertion style. Do not introduce a second testing dialect.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 117 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 223d7068c4ef
test-writing is a skill published in the GitHub repository andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojo (54 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 1,037 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Assert what the code's users can observe, so that the test fails when that behavior breaks and keeps passing when only the internals change.
implement
Use when an approved plan and task list exist and it is time to turn them into working, tested code — the SDD phase after analyze and before verify. Enforces TDD: a failing test comes before the code that makes it pass, one task at a time, appended to a progress ledger that survives compaction. Delegates test tooling…
nw-fp-clojure
Clojure language-specific patterns, data-first modeling, REPL-driven development, and spec.
nw-fp-fsharp
F# language-specific patterns, Railway-Oriented Programming, and Computation Expressions.
nw-test-organization-conventions
Test directory structure patterns by architecture style, language conventions, naming rules, and fixture placement. Decision tree for selecting test organization strategy.
nw-fp-kotlin
Kotlin language-specific patterns with Arrow, Raise DSL, and coroutine-based effects.