Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ericrisco/rsc-harness --skill implementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ericrisco/rsc-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ericrisco/rsc-harness/implement)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ericrisco/rsc-harness/implement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ericrisco/rsc-harness/implement/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ericrisco/rsc-harness/implement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ericrisco/rsc-harness/implement.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Privilege Escalation · line 312 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 44 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00123 | $0.05743 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00049 | $0.02297 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.01149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00574 |
Grade A, and why
implement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 384 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
implement — turn the task list into tested code
You have a spec, a plan, and an ordered task list (from specify → plan → tasks), and the
analyze gate has cleared. This skill does the building: it walks the tasks in order, writes each
one test-first, stops to show its work after every task, and records the decisions it makes
along the way. It is the intent → shipped code engine's hands — verify is the gate that comes
after, not part of this skill.
This is a process skill. It owns the discipline (red → green → refactor, checkpoints, decision
logging, constitution adherence). It does not own the test tooling — pytest fixtures, go test
table-drivers, Vitest/Playwright, flutter test — those belong to the stack skill, and you call
into them rather than reinventing them.
Before you write a line of code
Run this short gate. Skipping it is the most common way an implement session goes sideways. This gate is a hard refuse, not a checklist to feel good about: if it fails you stop and route back — you do not write feature code anyway.
- The spec + plan must exist AND be approved. Open the spec (
02-DOCS/wiki/sdd/specs/<slug>.md), the plan (02-DOCS/wiki/sdd/plans/<slug>.md, which holds the task list), and the constitution (02-DOCS/wiki/sdd/constitution.md). If any is missing, you are not allowed to implement — route back: no spec →specify; no plan →plan; no task list inside the plan →tasks; unresolvedanalyzefindings → resolve them first. If a spec/plan exists but the user has not actually seen and approved it, get that approval first. Never "start coding to discover the plan as you go", and never accept "just build it, skip the spec" on a non-trivial feature — name the gate in one friendly line and route tospecify. (Only a true one-line, low-risk change earns a skip, and you say so.) - Read the SDD runtime config. Open
02-DOCS/wiki/sdd/config.yaml. If it is missing on non-trivial work, stop and route tosdd-init. Usetesting.strict_tdd,testing.commands.apply,testing.commands.verify,sdd.review_budgetandsdd.registry_path. Do not choose a different test command from memory while config exists. - Read the skill registry. Open
.rsc/skill-registry.jsonif present. Select only the relevant stack/process skills for this task, then digest them into compact rules. If the registry is missing, run or recommendnpx @ericrisco/rsc registry refreshand record the fallback. - Read the register. Open
02-DOCS/wiki/harness/user-profile.mdand readtechnical_level. It picks technical terms or plain words with analogies at each checkpoint (see "Checkpoints" below). No profile yet → use analogies, and ask before any irreversible step. - Confirm isolation. Default branch open for this project → work on it. Closed → stop before
the first commit and ask: this branch, a new one, or unlock (
worktrees)? Never branch on your own; another session in this folder makes the worktree mandatory. - Scan the tasks for independence. Mark which tasks share files/state and which are disjoint.
Disjoint clusters are candidates for
parallel; everything else runs in order.
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 14d ago Changed 538caf3ac84c
- 17d ago Changed · -4 lines 6576ad2906c6
- 1mo ago First seen · 388 lines · 123 tokens per session scan A 34be01180fb7
implement is a skill published in the GitHub repository ericrisco/rsc-harness (232 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 123 tokens to every session and 5,743 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-driven-development
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code.
test-driven-development
Writing code with tests first: RED-GREEN-REFACTOR, reproduce bugs as failing tests before fixing, and avoid testing anti-patterns. Use when implementing behaviour, fixing a defect, or asked to add tests.
atomic-tdd
Test-first discipline. Auto-triggers on "let's implement X", "add feature Y", "fix bug Z", "write a test for", "implement", "build out", and similar pre-code-change phrases. Iron rule: failing test exists before production code. Skip only for pure docs/config changes with an explicit "skipped because:" note. Explicit…
rudder
Use locally captured coding-session intent to resolve a device-local behavioral spec, generate focused tests from that spec, implement the smallest production changes through red-green TDD, and verify coverage with the repository's native tooling. Use when the user asks to run Rudder, create or regenerate tests for…
tdd
A Test-Driven Development guide. TDD means writing a failing test first, adding the smallest implementation that passes it, and then improving the code while keeping the tests passing.
implement
TDD implementation - make failing tests pass.