Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add APIPASS-Integrations/apipass-headless --skill review-flowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/APIPASS-Integrations/apipass-headlessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/apipass-integrations/apipass-headless/review-flow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/apipass-integrations/apipass-headless/review-flow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/apipass-integrations/apipass-headless/review-flow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/apipass-integrations/apipass-headless/review-flow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/apipass-integrations/apipass-headless/review-flow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00112 | $0.07231 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00056 | $0.03615 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.01446 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00723 |
Grade A, and why
review-flow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 321 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review de Fluxo APIPASS
Audita um fluxo existente contra as convenções e boas práticas da plataforma APIPASS e produz um relatório com findings classificados por severidade.
1. Autenticação
Verificar apipass_auth_status. Se não autenticado, chamar apipass_login antes de continuar.
2. Resolução do Fluxo
- Se o usuário passou um nome: chamar
list_flowse localizar pelo nome (case-insensitive). - Se passou um ID: usar diretamente.
- Se ambíguo: perguntar ao usuário qual fluxo deseja revisar (listar as opções encontradas).
3. Coleta de Dados
Executar em paralelo:
get_flow_development(flowId) → estrutura completa (steps, counters, logEnabled)
get_flow_info(flowId) → metadados (nome, trigger, projeto)
get_published_environments_for_flow(flowId) → environments publicados (para regra S1)
Para fluxos com steps NodeJS ou custom actions, chamar também:
get_custom_action_file(actionId) → inspecionar código JS (regras JS1–JS6)
Para steps SQL, extrair as queries dos campos rawData/inputData para análise estática (regras SQL1–SQL5) — não requer chamada adicional, os dados já vêm em get_flow_development.
3a. Subfluxos Aninhados
Após coletar o fluxo principal, identificar todos os subfluxos referenciados:
- RunChildFlow (
type: ".utility.runchildflow.RunChildFlow"ou similar): extrair oflowIddo subfluxo referenciado noinputData/mappingAttributes. - Steps AMS (
coreRouteType: "AMS_SEND_MESSAGE"): localizar o fluxo consumidor da fila — geralmente documentado no campodocumentationdo step ou identificável pelo nome da fila. Localizar vialist_flowsfiltrando pelo nome da fila.
Para cada subfluxo identificado, executar o mesmo ciclo de coleta (get_flow_development, get_flow_info, get_published_environments_for_flow) e aplicar todas as mesmas regras de revisão (seção 4). Reportar os findings de cada subfluxo em seção própria no relatório, identificada pelo nome do subfluxo.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 321 lines · 112 tokens per session scan A 54a7c1027c01
review-flow is a skill published in the GitHub repository APIPASS-Integrations/apipass-headless (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 112 tokens to every session and 7,231 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…