Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to apokamo/kaji. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apokamo/kaji/main/.claude/skills/i-doc-fix/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/apokamo/kajiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/apokamo/kaji/i-doc-fix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/apokamo/kaji/i-doc-fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/apokamo/kaji/i-doc-fix/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/apokamo/kaji/i-doc-fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/apokamo/kaji/i-doc-fix.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00730 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00365 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00146 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
i-doc-fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
I Doc Fix
docs review の指摘事項に対応する。このスキルでも コード、設定、テストは変更しない。
いつ使うか
| タイミング | このスキルを使用 |
|---|---|
i-doc-review または i-doc-verify が RETRY のとき |
✅ 必須 |
ワークフロー内の位置: update-doc → review-doc → fix-doc → verify-doc
入力
ハーネス経由（コンテキスト変数）
| 変数 | 型 | 説明 |
|---|---|---|
issue_id |
str | 正規化済み Issue ID（GitHub 数値または local ID） |
issue_ref |
str | 人間可読の Issue 参照（GitHub では #<issue_id>、local では bare ID） |
step_id |
str | 現在のステップ ID |
previous_verdict |
str | 前ステップの verdict |
手動実行（スラッシュコマンド）
$ARGUMENTS = <issue_id>
解決ルール
コンテキスト変数 issue_id が存在すればそちらを使用。
なければ $ARGUMENTS の第1引数を issue_id として使用。
issue_ref はハーネス経由ではプロンプトに自動注入される（prompt.py 側で provider 別に整形）。手動実行時は issue_id から導出する: GitHub 数値 ID なら #<issue_id>、local-* 形式なら bare ID（# を付けない）。
前提知識の読み込み
実行手順
previous_verdictまたは Issue コメントから最新レビュー結果を取得- Must Fix を 1 件ずつ検討
- docs のみ修正
- 実装 / CLI / AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md / 関連 docs との整合を再確認
- 修正対象ファイルに絞って以下を実行:
cd [worktree_dir] && python3 scripts/check_doc_links.py [changed-markdown-files...] - docs のみコミット
- 対応内容を Issue にコメント
Verdict 出力
---VERDICT---
status: PASS
reason: |
docs review の指摘に対応した
evidence: |
Must Fix 項目を修正し、関連する docs と実装の整合を再確認した
suggestion: |
---END_VERDICT---
status の選択基準
| status | 条件 |
|---|---|
| PASS | 修正完了 |
| ABORT | docs 修正だけでは解決不能 |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 79 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 726d24136f1d
i-doc-fix is a skill published in the GitHub repository apokamo/kaji (12 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 730 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
software-design-lifecycle-tech-detailed-methodology
Use when an architect must run the detailed-design portion of technical design, preserve the full lifecycle-stage doctrine for detailed design, and define the concrete runtime, project, flow, data, interface, non-functional, security, recovery, hardware, and implementation-plan surfaces needed for execution.
software-design-lifecycle-solution-design-biz-arch-diagramming
A method for designing and reviewing a business-solution architecture: a middle-level view that connects confirmed business problems to a solution before technical implementation is designed.
software-design-lifecycle-tech-overview-system-arch-diagramming
A guide for architects who draw or review system architecture diagrams during overview design. It explains subsystems, outside dependencies, communication links, and system boundaries without going into every technology detail.
creative-claude-design
Design one-off HTML artifacts (landing, deck, prototype).
diagram-drawio
Use when the user requests diagrams, flowcharts, architecture diagrams, ER diagrams, UML / sequence / class diagrams, network topology, ML/DL model figures (Transformer/CNN/LSTM), mind maps, or any visualization. Also use proactively when explaining systems with 3+ components, complex data flows, or relationships that…
software-development-norms
Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code in any language to apply industrial-grade development norms abstracted from the Alibaba Java Development Handbook. Covers naming, type safety, exceptions, logging, concurrency, databases, project structure, testing, and security with language-agnostic principles and…