Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/apokamo/kaji/issue-createnpx skills add apokamo/kaji --skill issue-creategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/apokamo/kajiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/apokamo/kaji/issue-create)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/apokamo/kaji/issue-create"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/apokamo/kaji/issue-create.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00046 | $0.02629 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.01314 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00526 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00263 |
Grade A, and why
issue-create scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 164 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Issue Create
GitHub Issue を作成し、適切なラベルを付与する。
本スキルは issue-review-ready（.claude/skills/issue-review-ready/SKILL.md の共通・type 別チェック観点）で RETRY にならない水準の本文を生成することを目標とする。単なるテンプレ埋めではなく、「何を」「どこに」「なぜ」「何が満たされれば完了か」「その根拠」を明示できるまで対話で不足を補う。
いつ使うか
| タイミング | このスキルを使用 |
|---|---|
| 新機能・バグ修正・リファクタの着手前 | ✅ 必須 |
| 既存Issueがある場合 | ❌ 不要 |
ワークフロー内の位置: create → (grill-me: 任意・明示起動) → review-ready → start → ...
引数
$ARGUMENTS = <title> [type] [description]
title(必須): Issue タイトルtype(任意):feat/fix/refactor/docs/test/chore/perf/security（デフォルト: feat）description(任意): 詳細説明。省略時は対話で収集。
type → ラベル マッピング
参照:
docs/rfc/github-labels-standardization.md（GitHub Labels 標準化ドキュメント）
| type | ラベル | 用途 |
|---|---|---|
feat |
type:feature |
新機能追加 |
fix |
type:bug |
バグ修正 |
refactor |
type:refactor |
リファクタリング |
docs |
type:docs |
ドキュメント |
test |
type:test |
テスト追加・改善 |
chore |
type:chore |
雑務・依存の掃除 |
perf |
type:perf |
パフォーマンス改善 |
security |
type:security |
セキュリティ対応 |
実行手順
Step 1: 引数の解析
$ARGUMENTS から title, type, description を取得する。
typeが未指定ならfeatをデフォルトとするdescriptionが未指定または情報不足なら、ユーザーに対話で詳細を確認する
Step 2: review-ready のチェック観点に沿った素材収集
本文起草の前に、以下が揃っているかを確認する。不足している場合は 対話で補う、またはコマンド実行・ファイル閲覧で事実を確認する。推測で埋めない。
| # | 観点（review-ready） | 収集する情報 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 構造の完備 | 概要・目的・完了条件の3セクションを埋める材料 |
| 2 | 概要の具体性 | 「何を」「どこに」: 対象モジュール / ディレクトリ / ファイルパス、対象ドキュメントパス |
| 3 | 目的の根拠 | 背景・動機: 既存コード/ドキュメント/運用で困っている具体的事象 |
| 4 | 完了条件の検証可能性 | 客観的に判定可能な条件（CLI 実行結果、ファイル存在、テスト通過、docs 整合等） |
| 5 | 1次情報の明示 | 外部 URL、docs/ パス、関連 Issue/PR 番号、ログ、CLI 出力のいずれか |
| 6 | 記述間の整合性 | 概要・目的・完了条件が互いに矛盾しないこと |
| 7 | 作業スコープの推定可能性 | dev: 対象ファイル/ディレクトリ/技術スタック。docs-only: 対象ドキュメントパスまたは領域 |
| 14 | workflow 内判定可能性 | RETRY して環境非依存で同じ結果を得られる条件と、merge・実機適用・外部応答後の確認を分離する材料 |
| 15 | 重要判断の着手可能性 | 共通正本に従い、source of truth の指定、人間が決定済みの方針と出典、未決の重要判断と可逆性を収集する。one-way door は起票時に人間へ確認 |
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 164 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 4f81f1034745
issue-create is a skill published in the GitHub repository apokamo/kaji (12 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 2,629 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
feishu
Work with Feishu or Lark bots, docs, sheets, bitables, approval flows, and OpenAPI/MCP setup without hardcoding credentials.
interview
Ask one useful structured question at a time only when material product/implementation choices are genuinely missing; remember answers and produce a brief/spec. Discoverable facts should be investigated instead of asked.
local-frontend-check
Smoke-test or verify UI behaviour on the local Jarvis Registry frontend running at http://localhost/gateway. Use for manual regression checks, bug-fix verification, and end-to-end confirmation of specific flows without running the automated test suite.
ppt-review
Read this skill only after current officereview structural output and relevant rendered images exist. Do not use source code, a tool success flag, or the first-slide preview as a substitute for deck evidence.
helmor-debug-operate
Operate, reproduce, and debug a running local Helmor desktop development build through the Tauri MCP bridge. Use when the user asks to use Tauri MCP, towery MCP, the local dev build, the Tauri webview, visual end-to-end validation, UI automation, screenshots, DOM/accessibility snapshots, IPC or log tracing…
autoprompt
Explicit-only useful-first orchestration. Invoke /autoprompt to turn a mission into one executable roadmap, build dependency-safe lanes, and verify the result with independent reviewers. Never infer invocation from ordinary requests. Never resume from leftover artifacts without an explicit resume instruction.