Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/apokamo/kaji/issue-review-codenpx skills add apokamo/kaji --skill issue-review-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/apokamo/kajiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/apokamo/kaji/issue-review-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/apokamo/kaji/issue-review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/apokamo/kaji/issue-review-code.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00037 | $0.04933 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.02466 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00987 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00493 |
Grade A, and why
issue-review-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 322 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Issue Review Code
重要: このスキルは実装/設計を行ったセッションとは 別のセッション で実行することを推奨します。 同一セッションで実行すると、実装時のバイアスがレビュー判断に影響する可能性があります。
実装コードに対して、設計書を基に厳格なコードレビューを実施します。
いつ使うか
| タイミング | このスキルを使用 |
|---|---|
/issue-implement 完了後 |
✅ 必須 |
| 実装途中 | ⚠️ 任意（中間レビューとして） |
ワークフロー内の位置: implement → review-code → (fix → verify) → i-dev-final-check → i-pr → close
入力
ハーネス経由（コンテキスト変数）
常に注入される変数:
| 変数 | 型 | 説明 |
|---|---|---|
issue_id |
str | 正規化済み Issue ID（GitHub 数値または local ID） |
issue_ref |
str | 人間可読の Issue 参照（GitHub では #<issue_id>、local では bare ID） |
step_id |
str | 現在のステップ ID |
条件付きで注入される変数:
| 変数 | 型 | 条件 | 説明 |
|---|---|---|---|
cycle_count |
int | サイクル内ステップのみ | 現在のイテレーション番号 |
max_iterations |
int | サイクル内ステップのみ | サイクルの上限回数 |
手動実行（スラッシュコマンド）
$ARGUMENTS = <issue_id>
解決ルール
コンテキスト変数 issue_id が存在すればそちらを使用。
なければ $ARGUMENTS の第1引数を issue_id として使用。
issue_ref はハーネス経由ではプロンプトに自動注入される（prompt.py 側で provider 別に整形）。手動実行時は issue_id から導出する: GitHub 数値 ID なら #<issue_id>、local-* 形式なら bare ID（# を付けない）。
前提知識の読み込み
以下のドキュメントを Read ツールで読み込んでから作業を開始すること。
- 開発ワークフロー:
docs/dev/development_workflow.md - テスト規約:
docs/dev/testing-convention.md - Python スタイル:
docs/reference/python/python-style.md（必要に応じて他のdocs/reference/python/*.mdも追加読込）
共通ルール
- _shared/report-unrelated-issues.md — 作業中に発見した無関係な問題の報告ルール
実行手順
Step 1: コンテキストの取得
-
_shared/worktree-resolve.md の手順に従い、Worktree の絶対パスを取得。
-
設計情報の取得:
cat [worktree_dir]/draft/design/issue-[issue_id]-*.md -
実装サマリーの取得:
kaji issue view [issue_id] --comments直近の「実装完了報告」を確認する。baseline の正本は Issue コメントではなく artifact とする。
-
実装差分の取得:
cd [worktree_dir] && git diff main...HEAD変更内容を把握。差分が大きい場合は主要ファイルを個別に確認。
Step 1.4: Pre-Handoff Review 証跡の存在チェック（hard gate）
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 322 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 579f0b638713
issue-review-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository apokamo/kaji (12 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 4,933 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
feishu
Work with Feishu or Lark bots, docs, sheets, bitables, approval flows, and OpenAPI/MCP setup without hardcoding credentials.
interview
Ask one useful structured question at a time only when material product/implementation choices are genuinely missing; remember answers and produce a brief/spec. Discoverable facts should be investigated instead of asked.
local-frontend-check
Smoke-test or verify UI behaviour on the local Jarvis Registry frontend running at http://localhost/gateway. Use for manual regression checks, bug-fix verification, and end-to-end confirmation of specific flows without running the automated test suite.
ppt-review
Read this skill only after current officereview structural output and relevant rendered images exist. Do not use source code, a tool success flag, or the first-slide preview as a substitute for deck evidence.
helmor-debug-operate
Operate, reproduce, and debug a running local Helmor desktop development build through the Tauri MCP bridge. Use when the user asks to use Tauri MCP, towery MCP, the local dev build, the Tauri webview, visual end-to-end validation, UI automation, screenshots, DOM/accessibility snapshots, IPC or log tracing…
autoprompt
Explicit-only useful-first orchestration. Invoke /autoprompt to turn a mission into one executable roadmap, build dependency-safe lanes, and verify the result with independent reviewers. Never infer invocation from ordinary requests. Never resume from leftover artifacts without an explicit resume instruction.