Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add appeeky/google-play-console-cli --skill gps-compliancegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/appeeky/google-play-console-cliWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/appeeky/google-play-console-cli/gps-compliance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/appeeky/google-play-console-cli/gps-compliance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/appeeky/google-play-console-cli/gps-compliance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/appeeky/google-play-console-cli/gps-compliance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/appeeky/google-play-console-cli/gps-compliance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00241 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00096 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
gps-compliance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Compliance and recovery
Data safety
gps --package $PKG --confirm call gps_set_data_safety '{
"packageName":"'"$PKG"'",
"safetyLabels": { }
}'
Only set data safety when the user provides the declaration payload. Do not invent safety labels.
App recovery
gps --package $PKG recovery list
gps ops recovery
Ops: gps_list_app_recoveries, gps_create_app_recovery, gps_deploy_app_recovery, gps_cancel_app_recovery, gps_add_app_recovery_targeting.
Device tiers
gps --package $PKG device-tiers
gps call gps_list_device_tier_configs '{"packageName":"'"$PKG"'"}'
Writes (create) require --confirm and a valid config body from the user or an existing template.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 39 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 0f3e9438dd7b
gps-compliance is a skill published in the GitHub repository appeeky/google-play-console-cli (40 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 241 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
app-store-preflight-compliance
Pre-submission compliance scanner workflow for Apple App Store apps. Use when reviewing iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, or visionOS projects (Swift, Objective-C, React Native, Expo) for App Store rejection risks, submission readiness, privacy compliance, or guideline violations.
android-expert
Expert in Android development with Jetpack Compose, Material Design, ViewModel, and modern Android architecture. Use when the user mentions mobile, Kotlin, Jetpack Compose, Material Design, or Google, or when the task involves Android Architecture, Android Components, Jetpack Libraries, or Activity/Fragment Lifecycle.
store-compliance-pro
Audits an Apple or Android app and its store listings for region-specific rejection risks — third-party AI brand mentions, generative-AI and licensing rules (China mainland ICP and CAC filings, game licenses, gambling, loans, VPNs), EU trader status, storefront-based feature gating, privacy consent order for Chinese…
gplay-compliance
Data Safety declaration from a versioned CSV with gplay compliance, the only Play compliance surface with an API. Use when updating or CI-gating the Data Safety form, or when asked to automate content rating or another Console-only declaration.
app-store-compliance
Run an enterprise pre submission compliance audit on a mobile app project before uploading to the Apple App Store or Google Play. Use when the user is about to submit, ship, or release an iOS or Android app, when an app was rejected and needs a fix plan, when reviewing App Store Review Guidelines or Google Play policy…
app-store-review
Audit an iOS app's App Store submission readiness and rejection risk for a fintech app — App Review Guidelines domains (Safety/Performance/Business/Design/Legal), PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy (NSPrivacyAccessedAPITypes required-reason APIs, NSPrivacyTrackingDomains, NSPrivacyCollectedDataTypes), App Privacy nutrition labels…