Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add appsec-foundry/appsec-advisor --skill report-errorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/appsec-foundry/appsec-advisorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/appsec-foundry/appsec-advisor/report-error)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/appsec-foundry/appsec-advisor/report-error"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/appsec-foundry/appsec-advisor/report-error/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/appsec-foundry/appsec-advisor/report-error"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/appsec-foundry/appsec-advisor/report-error.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01793 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00717 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00359 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00179 |
Grade A, and why
report-error scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed c7c2e72c247a
- 18d ago Changed 2b9fefd71387
- 1mo ago Changed · -7 lines · -58 tokens per session 8e0b24ec2355
- 1mo ago First seen · 84 lines · 99 tokens per session scan A 90a53b095065
report-error is a skill published in the GitHub repository appsec-foundry/appsec-advisor (17 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,793 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ffuf-claude-skill
Skill "ffuf-claude-skill" from Agent-Threat-Rule/agent-threat-rules, covering ffuf claude skill, when to use this skill and instructions.
codeinspectus-fix-one
Investigate and remediate exactly one user-selected CodeInspectus finding with evidence-gated reproduction, a separately approved minimal patch, focused regression testing, and an exact-prior-scan rescan. Use when a user asks an agent to examine, reproduce, fix, or verify one CodeInspectus finding without batching…
owasp-top-10-web
Reviews web applications against the OWASP Top 10:2021 vulnerability categories. Auto-invoked when reviewing web application code, server configurations, or when a user asks for a general security review of a web application. Produces structured findings mapped to A01-A10 with CWE references, severity ratings, and…
detecting-memory-safety-bugs
Find memory-safety bugs in C/C++ and other unmanaged code - use-after-free, double-free, out-of-bounds read/write, uninitialized use, and NULL deref - by reasoning about object lifetime and buffer bounds along real code paths. Use on an authorized source target when a candidate catalog does NOT model these…
finding-fail-open-flaws
Find security controls that grant access when they should deny it: an authorization check that returns allow on error or timeout, an empty or wildcard allowlist that matches everything, a default-allow branch when input is missing or unrecognized, and a caught exception that swallows a denial and continues. Use when…
hunting-bug-variants
Given one confirmed vulnerability, systematically find its siblings: the same defect shape repeated elsewhere in the codebase, and the parts of it the fix left uncovered. Use right after you confirm or read about a bug (your own finding, a CVE, a patch, a writeup) and want the other instances instead of stopping at…