Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add AppsVortex/arness/plugin install arn-infraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/appsvortex/arness/arn-infra-review-change)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/appsvortex/arness/arn-infra-review-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/appsvortex/arness/arn-infra-review-change/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/appsvortex/arness/arn-infra-review-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/appsvortex/arness/arn-infra-review-change.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00105 | $0.02236 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00042 | $0.00894 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00447 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00224 |
Grade A, and why
arn-infra-review-change scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 229 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Arness Infra Review Change
Perform a comprehensive post-execution quality review of completed infrastructure changes. This skill reads all phase execution reports, the original spec, and the source plan, then invokes the arn-infra-change-reviewer agent to evaluate 7 quality categories and produce a structured review report with an overall verdict.
This is the quality gate between execution and documentation. A PASS or WARN verdict enables documentation generation. A NEEDS_FIXES verdict identifies specific remediation actions and suggests re-executing affected phases.
Prerequisites
Read ## Arness from the project's CLAUDE.md. If no ## Arness section exists or Arness Infra fields are missing, inform the user: "Arness Infra is not configured for this project yet. Run /arn-infra-wizard to get started — it will set everything up automatically." Do not proceed without it.
Check the Deferred field. If Deferred: yes, inform the user: "Infrastructure is in deferred mode. Change review is not available until infrastructure is fully configured. Run /arn-infra-assess to un-defer." Stop.
Extract:
- Infra plans directory -- where structured plan projects live (default:
.arness/infra-plans) - Infra specs directory -- where change specs are stored (default:
.arness/infra-specs) - Providers -- cloud providers configured
- Environments -- environment names in promotion order
- Experience level -- derived from user profile. Read
~/.arness/user-profile.yaml(or.claude/arness-profile.local.mdif it exists — project override takes precedence). Apply the experience derivation mapping from${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/arn-infra-ensure-config/references/experience-derivation.md. If no profile exists, check for legacyExperience levelin## Arnessas fallback. - Cost threshold -- monthly budget limit for cost compliance evaluation (default:
100)
Locate the Completed Change Project
Search for completed or in-progress change projects:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 229 lines · 105 tokens per session scan A e5d3000e2926
arn-infra-review-change is a skill published in the GitHub repository AppsVortex/arness (33 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 105 tokens to every session and 2,236 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-25.
Other skills, from other repositories
brooks-sweep
Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…
critical-code-reviewer
Rigorously review code or pull requests for correctness, security, accessibility, maintainability, tests, and edge cases. Use when users request a critical code review, want a guided walkthrough of findings, need implementer-facing feedback, or want to prepare, create, or submit a GitHub pull request review.
pr-review
Comprehensive PR review across six dimensions — cost impact, environment drift, ownership gaps, SOC 2 compliance, deprecated API / version hygiene, and rollback feasibility. Each mode inspects the diff and current file state, reports findings with severity, and recommends concrete fixes. Use when preparing a PR for…
genshijin-review
A compact pull-request review format that writes one actionable finding per line in Japanese or English.
pr-review
Use when the user wants to deeply review a pull/merge request or a local diff — "review this PR", "grill the MR", "stress-test this diff", "deep-dive code review", "code review before merge", or when they name a PR/MR URL, number, branch, commit range (A..B/A...B), tag or SHA. Works on GitHub (gh), GitLab (glab), or a…
shipyard-handoff
Captures session context into .shipyard/HANDOFF.md so the next session can resume without losing progress. Use when the user says "handoff", "save context", or "I'm done for now", or when a long session ends and its state should be recorded.