Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE --skill api-design-assistantgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SEWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/api-design-assistant)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/api-design-assistant"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/api-design-assistant/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/api-design-assistant"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/api-design-assistant.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 4 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 56 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- high Tool Misuse · line 304 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- high Tool Misuse · line 309 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- high Tool Misuse · line 313 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00089 | $0.02634 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.01054 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00527 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00263 |
Grade A, and why
api-design-assistant scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 417 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
API Design Assistant
Overview
Assist with designing well-structured, RESTful APIs by suggesting endpoints, parameters, return types, and best practices. Generate OpenAPI specifications and provide implementation guidance.
Workflow
1. Understand Requirements
When designing a new API or reviewing an existing one, first understand:
For new API design:
- What is the domain/purpose of the API?
- What resources need to be exposed? (users, products, orders, etc.)
- What operations are needed? (create, read, update, delete, custom actions)
- Who are the consumers? (web app, mobile app, third-party integrations)
- Are there specific requirements? (authentication, rate limiting, versioning)
For API review:
- What are the existing endpoints?
- What issues or improvements are needed?
- Are there consistency problems?
- Are best practices being followed?
2. Design or Review API Structure
Follow these steps based on the use case:
Designing New APIs
Step 1: Identify Resources
Map domain concepts to API resources:
- User management →
/users - Product catalog →
/products - Order processing →
/orders - User's orders →
/users/{userId}/orders
Step 2: Define Endpoints
For each resource, determine needed operations:
# Users resource
GET /users # List users
POST /users # Create user
GET /users/{id} # Get specific user
PUT /users/{id} # Replace user
PATCH /users/{id} # Update user
DELETE /users/{id} # Delete user
# Nested resources
GET /users/{id}/orders # Get user's orders
POST /users/{id}/orders # Create order for user
# Actions
POST /users/{id}/activate # Activate user
POST /orders/{id}/cancel # Cancel order
Step 3: Design Request/Response Schemas
Define what data each endpoint expects and returns. See best-practices.md for detailed examples.
Step 4: Add Supporting Features
- Authentication (Bearer tokens, API keys)
- Pagination (page-based, cursor-based)
- Filtering and sorting
- Error handling
- Versioning strategy
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 417 lines · 89 tokens per session scan A 6ad0ed8fb97c
api-design-assistant is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE (258 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 89 tokens to every session and 2,634 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-developer-relations
SDK development, external developer communication, code samples, API client libraries, community engagement, and developer experience. Use when creating SDKs, writing external guides, creating code samples, or improving developer experience.
skill-architecture
This skill should be used when the user asks to "design a system", "architecture", "ADR", "system design", "tech stack", "choose between approaches", "coupling", "service granularity", "blueprint", "component design", "API contract", "schema design", "trade-offs", or discusses "monolith", "microservices", "fitness…
skill-api-design
REST/gRPC API design, versioning strategies, error codes, request/response contracts, backward compatibility, rate limiting, OpenAPI specifications. Use when designing APIs, defining contracts, planning versioning, or ensuring API consistency.
skill-code-quality
This skill should be used when implementing code quality standards, setting up linting/testing/security scans, enforcing coverage thresholds, or establishing CI/CD guardrails.
skill-pr-review
Comprehensive code review for pull requests using parallel multi-agent analysis. Audits CLAUDE.md compliance, checks for bugs, analyzes git history, reviews comments, and filters by confidence score. Use when reviewing a GitHub PR, mentions "code review", "review this PR", or "/code-review".
teach
Teach the user a new skill or concept, within this workspace.